Page 404 - Water and wastewater engineering
P. 404

SEDIMENTATION 10-21

            TABLE 10-1
            Alternative settling tank configurations
          Nomenclature                Configuration or comment
          Horizontal flow             Long rectangular tanks
          Center feed                 Circular, horizontal flow
          Peripheral feed             Circular, horizontal flow
          Upflow clarifiers           Proprietary
          Upflow, solids contact      Recirculation of sludge with sludge blanket, proprietary
          High-rate settler modules   Rectangular tank, parallel plates or tubes, proprietary
          Ballasted sand              Addition of microsand, proprietary
           Adapted from Kawamura, 2000.


               With the exception of the upflow solids contact unit that was discussed in Chapter 7, the
          remainder of this discussion will focus on the preferred alternatives.

            Rectangular Sedimentation Basins.  Current design practice is shifting from rectangular sedimen-
          tation basins to high-rate settler modules or, in some cases, dissolved air flotation (DAF). The rectan-
          gular sedimentation basin design is presented here because, historically, it has been the most frequently
          used design and because it serves as the fundamental structure for high-rate settler modules.
               A rectangular basin with horizontal flow is shown in  Figure 10-13 . To provide redundancy,
          two basins are placed longitudinally with a common wall. The inlet structure is designed to dis-
          tribute flocculated water over the entire cross section. Outlet structures for rectangular tanks
          generally include launders placed parallel to the length of the tank. Cross baffles may be added to
          prevent the return of surface currents from the end of the tank back toward the inlet.
               Generally, sludge is removed by mechanical collectors. The major types of mechanical col-
          lectors ranked in order of cost are: (1) a traveling bridge with sludge-scraping squeegees and a
          mechanical cross collector at the influent end of the tank, (2) a traveling bridge with sludge suc-
          tion headers and pumps, (3) chain-and-flight collectors, and (4) sludge suction headers supported
          by floats and pulled by wires (MWH, 2005).
               As may be impled from its title, the traveling bridge system consists of a bridge across the
          width of the tank that travels up and down the tank on wheels resting on the tank wall or side
          rails. Either scraper blades or a suction device is suspended from the bridge to the sludge zone.
          The suction system is equipped with either a pump or it makes use of a siphon effect from the
          differential head between water levels in the clarifier and the sludge line to remove the sludge.
          For water treatment systems, the pump system is preferred.
               The chain-and-flight system consists of two strands of chain on either side of the collection
          area with “flights” running across the width of the collection area. The flights, formerly made of
          redwood, and now made of fiberglass reinforced composite, are attached at 3 m intervals. High
          density polyethylene (HDPE) wearing shoes are attached to the flights. These ride on T-rails cast
          into the concrete floor. The chain and sprocket drive, formerly made of steel, is now made of a
          high-strength composite material. Although the chains are corrosion free and require less mainte-
          nance, they have a tendency to stretch when first installed.
               A  cross collector,  or hopper, is placed at the influent end of the tank. Sludge is scraped to the
          end of the tank and pushed into the hopper.
   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409