Page 132 - Fluid Power Engineering

W i nd Measurement 109

4. NRGSystems. NRG #40C Anemometer, Calibrated. NRG Systems [Online]
2010. http://www.nrgsystems.com/sitecore/content/Products/1900.
aspx?pf=StandardSensors.
5. King, B., The How and Why of Wind Sensor Mounting, Conference 2009 Poster
Presentation, Chicago, 2009.
6. WindGuard, Deutsche. Summary of Cup Anemometer Classification
[Online] 12 2008. http://www.skypowerinternational.com/pdf/News%
20and%20Media/new/First Class Advanced Testing Results .pdf.
7. Taylor, M., Mackiewicz, P., Brower, M. C., and Markus, M., An Analysis of
Wind Resource Uncertainty in Energy Production Estimates, EWEC, London,
2004.
8. National Renewable Energy Lab. Wind Resource Assessment Handbook
[Online] 1997. www.nrel.gov/wind/pdfs/22223.pdf.
9. Crescenti, G. H., “A look back on two decades of Doppler Sodar compar-
ison studies.”Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 78: 651-673, 1997.
10. Moore, K., and Bailey, B. Recommended Practices for the Use of Sodar in Wind
Energy Resource Assessment, IEA Draft, Version 4, 2009.
11. Kelley, N., et al. Comparing Pulsed Doppler LIDAR and SODAR and Direct
MeasurementsforWindAssessment,NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory,
Golden, CO, 2007. NREL/CP-500-41792.
12. Burton, T., Sharpe, D., Jenkins, N., and Bossanyi, E. Wind Energy Handbook,
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2001.
13. Hansen, M. O. L. Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, EarthScan, Sterling, VA,
2008.
14. Wilson, R. E., Peter, B. S., and Lissaman, P. B. S. Applied Aerodynamics of
Wind Power Machines, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1974. http://ir.
library.oregonstate.edu/jspui/bitstream/1957/8140/1/Applied
Aerodynamics.pdf.
15. Walls, L., and Sass, W. Viability of Sodar for Long-Term Resource Assess-
ment, Windtech International, Sept. 2008.