Page 182 - Wind Energy Handbook
P. 182

156                        AERODYNAMICS OF HORIZONTAL-AXIS WIND TURBINES


          Duncan, W. J., Thom, A. S. and Young, A. D., (1970). Mechanics of fluids, Second edition.
             Edward Arnold, London, UK.
          Eggleston, D. M. and Stoddard, F. S., Wind Turbine Engineering Design, Van Nostrand
             Reinhold Co., New York, USA.
          Fung, Y. C., (1969). An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity. Dover, New York, USA.
          Katz, J. and Plotkin, A., (1991). Low-speed aerodynamics - from wing theory to panel methods.
             McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
          Prandtl, L. and Tietjens, O. G., (1957). Applied hydro- and aeromechanics. Dover, New York,
             USA.
          Stepniewski, W. Z. and Keys, C. N., (1984). Rotary-wing aerodynamics. Dover, New York, USA.



          Appendix: Lift and Drag of Aerofoils

          The forces acting on a body immersed in a fluid moving fluid can be resolved into
          stream-wise (drag) and normal (lift) components. Neglecting buoyancy, the fluid
          mechanics which give rise to lift and drag are associated with the boundary layer of
          slow-moving fluid close to the body’s surface. The fluid force on the surface of the
          body can be either parallel to the surface (viscous or skin friction force) or normal to
          the surface (pressure force).
            For a thorough understanding of the phenomena of lift and drag an aerody-
          namics text should be consulted but for the purposes of wind-turbine aerodynamics
          the basic results are given below.



          A3.1 Definition of Drag

          The drag on a body immersed in an oncoming flow is defined as the force on the
          body in a direction parallel to the flow direction. In a very slow-moving fluid the
          drag on a body may be directly attributable to the viscous, frictional shear stresses
          set up in the fluid due to the fact that, at the body wall, there is no relative motion.
          This type of flow is known as Stokes’ flow after Sir George Stokes.
            Two centuries before Stokes, Isaac Newton showed that that the shear stress t at a
          boundary wall, or between two layers of fluid moving relative to one another, is
          proportional to the transverse velocity gradient at the boundary, or between the
          two layers:

                                                 du
                                           ô ¼ ì                               (A3:1)
                                                 dy

          where the constant of proportionality is ì the fluid viscosity.
            Using Newton’s theory, Stokes determined the drag force on a sphere in creeping
          flow (Figure A3.1).
                                         Drag ¼ 3ðìUd                          (A3:2)

          where d is the sphere diameter and U is the general flow velocity.
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187