Page 180 - Wind Energy Handbook
P. 180

154                        AERODYNAMICS OF HORIZONTAL-AXIS WIND TURBINES


          helical and the wakes of other blades will also be present. Loewy (1957) developed
          a theory for a rotor blade that accounts for the repeated wake in a similar manner to
          Prandtl (see Section 3.8.3). As did Theodorsen, Loewy used two-dimensional, thin
          aerofoil theory and produced a modification to Theodorsen’s function. In Equation
          (3.216) the Bessel function of the first kind, J n (k), is multiplied by (1 þ W(k)) where
          W(k) is called the Loewy wake-spacing function.

                                                  1
                                     W(k) ¼                                   (3:219)
                                            e (2[d=c]kþi2ð)    1

          d is the wake spacing defined in Equation (3.75) and c is the chord of the aerofoil.
          Miller (1964) arrived at a very similar result to Loewy by using a discrete vortex
          wake model.
            Loewy’s and Miller’s theories apply only to the non-yawed rotor but Peters, Boyd
          and He (1989) have developed a much more extensive theory based upon the
          method of acceleration potential. A sufficient number of Kinner pressure distribu-
          tions are required to model both the radial and azimuthal pressure distribution on a
          helicopter rotor such that the pressure spikes of individual blades are present. The
          theory obviates the use of blade element theory and includes automatically un-
          steady effects and tip losses; modelling of the blade geometry by this method does
          present some problems, however. Suzuki and Hansen (1999) have applied the
          theory of Peters, Boyd and He to wind turbine rotors and make comparisons with
          the blade-element/momentum theory. Van Bussel’s theory (1995) is very similar to
          that of Peters, Boyd and He but is intended for application to wind turbines.




          References


          Betz, A., (1919). Schraubenpropeller mit geringstem energieverlust. Gottinger Nachr., Germany.
          Coleman, R. P., Feingold, A. M. and Stempin, C. W., (1945). ‘Evaluation of the induced
             velocity field of an idealised helicopter rotor’. N.A.C.A. A.R.R,. No. L5E10.
          Glauert, H., (1926a). ‘The analysis of experimental results in the windmill brake and vortex
             ring states of an airscrew’. ARCR R&M No. 1026.
          Glauert, H., (1926b). ‘A general theory of the autogyro’. ARCR R&M No. 1111.
          Glauert, H., (1935a). ‘Airplane propellers’. Aerodynamic theory (ed. Durand, W. F.). Julius
             Springer, Berlin, Germany.
          Glauert, H., (1935b). ‘Windmills and fans’. Aerodynamic theory (ed. Durand, W. F.). Julius
             Springer, Berlin, Germany.
          Goankar, G. H. and Peters, D. A., (1988). ‘Review of dynamic inflow modelling for rotorcraft
             flight dynamics’. Vertica, 2, 3, 213–242.
          Goldstein, S., (1929). ‘On the vortex theory of screw propeller’. Proc. Roy. Soc. (A), 123, 440.
          HaQuang, N. and Peters, D. A., (1988). ‘Dynamic inflow for practical applications’. J. Am.
             Heli. Soc., Technical Note.
          Himmelskamp, H., (1945). Profile investigations on a rotating airscrew. Ph.D. Thesis, Gottingen
             University, Germany.
          Hoerner, S. F., (1965). ‘Pressure drag on rotating bodies’. Fluid dynamic drag (ed. Hoerner,
             S. F.), pp. 3–14.
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185