Page 345 - Wind Energy Handbook
P. 345

EFFECT OF ACROSS-WIND TURBULENCE DISTRIBUTION                          319


             A5.4.1 Formula for normalized co-spectrum
                                                         Ð Ð  R
                                                          R
                                                   2
                                                                N
             It remains to evaluate S Q1 (n 1 ) ¼ (rUC f ) S u (n 1 )  0  0  ł (r, r9, n) c(r)c(r9)ì 1 (r)ì 1
                                                                uu
                                                   N
             (r9)dr dr9. The normalized co-spectrum, ł (r, r9, n), must decrease as the spacing
                                                   uu
             [r   r9] between the two points considered increases, and intuitively it is to be
             expected that the decrease would be more rapid for the higher frequency compo-
             nents of wind fluctuation. On an empirical basis, Davenport (1962) has proposed an
             exponential expression for the normalized co-spectrum as follows:
                                    N
                                   ł (r, r9, n) ¼ exp[ Cjr   r9jn=U]             (A5:21)
                                    uu
             where C is a non-dimensional decay constant. Davenport noted that measurements
             by Cramer (1958) indicated values of C ranging from 7 in unstable conditions to 50
             in stable conditions, but recommended the use of the lower figure as being the more
             conservative despite the likelihood of stable conditions in high winds. Dyrbye and
             Hansen (1997) quote Riso measurements reported by Mann (1994) which indicate a
             value of C of 9.4, and they recommend a value of 10 for use in design. A value of 9.2
             is implicitly assumed in Eurocode 1 (1997).
               There is an obvious inconsistency in the exponential expression for the normal-
             ized co-spectrum – when it is integrated up over the plane perpendicular to the
             wind direction, the result is positive instead of zero as it should be. This has led to
             the development of more complex expressions by Harris (1971) and Krenk (1995).
             However, the Davenport formulation will be used here, giving
                             2
               ó 2  ¼ S Q1 (n 1 )  ð n 1
                x1             2
                           2ä k
                               1
                                 ð ð                                          "  2  #
                                  R R
                           2
                   ¼ (rUC f ) S u (n 1 )  exp[ Cjr   r9jn 1 =U]c(r)c(r9)ì 1 (r)ì 1 (r9)dr dr9  ð n 1 2
                                  0  0                                         2ä k 1
                                                                                 (A5:22)
             The resonant response can be expressed in terms of the first mode component, x 1 ,of
             the steady response,
                                                ð R
                                               1
                                        1  2
                                        2 rU C f   ì 1 (r)c(r)dr
                                              k 1 0
             from Equation (A5.11) giving
                                  ð ð
                                   R R
                                      exp [ Cjr   r9jn 1 =U]c(r)c(r9)ì 1 (r)ì 1 (r9)dr dr9
               ó 2    ó 2  ð 2
                x1  ¼ 4  u  R u (n 1 )  0  0                  !                  (A5:23)
                        2
                x 2   U 2ä                        ð R          2
                 1
                                                    c(r)ì 1 (r)dr
                                                   0
             Hence
   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350