Page 122 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 122

T1: IML
              P2: IML/FFX
                           QC: IML/FFX
  P1: IML/FFX
  AT029-03
                                                        14:23
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
            AT029-Manual
                                           June 22, 2007
         102 CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM FRACTIONS
         as the best method: Edmister–Pollock [14] for ASTM to TBP,
         Edmister–Okamoto [15–17] for ASTM to EFV, and Maxwell        TABLE 3.2—Correlation constants for Eq. (3.14).
                                                                                                  ASTM D 86
                                                                                                       a◦
         for conversion of TBP to EFV [19]. Most of these correlations  Vol%    a         b        range, C
                                                                      0
         were in graphical forms and inconvenient for computer appli-  10     0.9177    1.0019     20–320
                                                                              0.5564
                                                                                        1.0900
                                                                                                   35–305
         cations. Later, Arnold computerized these graphical methods  30      0.7617    1.0425     50–315
         through a set of nth order polynomials [20]. Correlation to  50      0.9013    1.0176     55–320
         convert ASTM D 2887 (SD) to ASTM D 86 were first developed    70      0.8821    1.0226     65–330
         by Ford using multiplier regression analysis [21]. In the mid  90    0.9552    1.0110     75–345
                                                                              0.8177
                                                                                                   75–400
                                                                      95
                                                                                        1.0355
         1980s Riazi and Daubert [22] developed analytical methods    Source: Ref. [22].
         for the conversion of distillation curves based on the general-  a Temperatures are approximated to nearest 5.
         ized correlation for hydrocarbon properties given by Eq. (2.2).
         These methods were adopted by the API in the fifth edition of  lation curve is available then ASTM curve can be estimated as
         API-TDB-88 [2] to replace the previous methods. Continued                         1/b
                                                                                        1
         interests from the petroleum industry for these conversion  (3.15)  ASTM D 86 =     (TBP) 1/b
         methods led to development of further methods. The latest                      a
         methods for the conversion of distillation curves were devel-  where constants a and bare given in Table 3.2 as for Eq. (3.14).
         oped by Daubert in mid 1990s [23] through modifying Riazi–
         Daubert correlations. In this section the API methods (Riazi–  3.2.2.1.2 ASTM D 86 and EFV Conversions—Application
         Daubert and Daubert) for conversion of distillation data are  of Eq. (2.13) to this type of conversion gives
         presented, which are also recommended and used in other  (3.16)    EFV = a(ASTM D 86) (SG) c
                                                                                              b
         references and industrial software [24, 25].
                                                              where constants a, b, and c were obtained from more than 300
         3.2.2.1 Riazi–Daubert Method                         data points and are given in Table 3.3. Equation (3.16) was
         Riazi and Daubert methods for the interconversion of vari-  evaluated with more than 300 data points from 43 different
                                                                                    ◦
         ous distillation data are based on the generalized correlation  samples and gave AAD of 6 C, while the method of Edmister–
                                                                                          ◦
         for property estimation of hydrocarbons in the form of Eq.  Okamoto [15] gave an AAD of 10 C [22, 26].
         (2.38). Available distillation temperature and specific gravity  In using these equations if specific gravity of a fraction is
         of the fraction are used as the input parameters to estimate  not available, it may be estimated from available distillation
         the desired distillation data in the following form [22]:  curves at 10 and 50% points as given by the following equa-
                                                              tion:
                                             b  c
        (3.13)      T i (desired) = a T i (available) SG                                 b  c

                                                              (3.17)              SG = aT T
                                                                                         10 50
         where T i (available) is the available distillation temperature  where constants a, b, and c for the three types of distillation
         at a specific vol% distilled and T i (desired) is the desired distil-  data, namely, ASTM D 86, TBP, and EFV, are given in Table
         lation data for the same vol% distilled, both are in kelvin. SG  3.4. Temperatures at 10 and 50% are both in kelvin.
         is the specific gravity of fraction at 15.5 C and a, b, and c are
                                         ◦
         correlation parameters specific for each conversion type and  3.2.2.1.3 SD to ASTM D 86 Conversions—The equation
         each vol% point on the distillation curve. For example, if this  derived from Eq. (3.13) for the conversion of simulated dis-
         equation is used to convert ASTM to EFV at 10%, T i (available)  tillation (ASTM D 2887) to ASTM D 86 distillation curve has
         is ASTM temperature at 10% and T i (desired) is the EFV tem-  the following form:
         perature at 10% and constants a, b, and c are specific for this
                                                                                              b
         conversion type at 10% of volume vaporized.          (3.18)         ASTM D 86 = a(SD) (F) c
                                                              where constant F is a parameter specifically used for this type
         3.2.2.1.1 ASTM D 86 and TBP Conversion—If distillation  of conversion and is given by the following equation:
         data available are in the form of ASTM D 86 and desired dis-                    0.05434     0.6147
         tillation is TBP, Eq. (3.13) can be used, but for this particular  (3.19)  F = 0.01411(SD 10%)  (SD 50%)
         type of conversion value of constant c for all points is zero  in which SD 10% and SD 50% are the SD temperatures in
         and the equation reduces to                          kelvin at 10 and 50 wt% distilled, respectively. Parameter F
        (3.14)          TBP = a(ASTM D 86) b                  calculated from Eq. (3.19) must be substituted in Eq. (3.18) to
                                                              estimate ASTM D 86 temperature at corresponding percent
         where both TBP and ASTM temperatures are for the same  point expressed in volume basis. Equation (3.18) cannot be
         vol% distilled and are in kelvin. Constants a and b at various
         points along the distillation curve with the range of applica-  TABLE 3.3—Correlation constants for Eq. (3.16).
         tion are given in Table 3.2.                                                              ASTM D 86
                                                                                                        a◦
          For a total of 559 data points for 80 different samples, Eq.  Vol%  a      b       c      range, C
         (3.14) gives an average absolute deviation (AAD) of about   10 0   2.9747  0.8466  0.4209   10–265
                                                                                           0.1287
                                                                                   0.9511
                                                                            1.4459
                                                                                                     60–320
         5 C, while the Edmister–Pollock method [14] gives an AAD    30     0.8506  1.0315  0.0817   90–340
          ◦
         of about 7 C. Generally predictions at 0% give higher errors  50   3.2680  0.8274  0.6214  110–355
                 ◦
         and are less reliable. Details of evaluations are given in our  70  8.2873  0.6871  0.9340  130–400
         previous publications [22, 26]. Equation (3.14) can be easily  90  10.6266  0.6529  1.1025  160–520
         reversed to predict ASTM from TBP data, but this is a rare  100    7.9952  0.6949  1.0737  190–430
                                                                    Source: Ref. [22].
         application as usually ASTM data are available. If TBP distil-  a Temperatures are approximated to nearest 5.
                                               --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127