Page 125 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 125

P2: IML/FFX
                           QC: IML/FFX
                                        T1: IML
  P1: IML/FFX
  AT029-03
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
                                                        14:23
                                           June 22, 2007
            AT029-Manual
                                                           3. CHARACTERIZATION OF PETROLEUM FRACTIONS 105
                                  TABLE 3.8—Prediction of TBP from ASTM for a kerosene sample of Example 3.3.
                                                                 Eq. (3.14)           Eqs. (3.20)–(3.22)
                           Vol%      ASTM D 86     TBP
                           distilled   exp, C     exp, C    TBP calc, C  AD, C    TBP calc, C   AD, C
                                                                  ◦
                                                                                        ◦
                                                                           ◦
                                          ◦
                                                                                                  ◦
                                                     ◦
                            0          165.6      146.1       134.1      12.0       133.1       13.0
                           10          176.7      160.6       160.6       0.0       158.1        2.5
                           30          193.3      188.3       188.2       0.1       189.2        0.9
                           50          206.7      209.4       208.9       0.5       210.6        1.2
                           70          222.8      230.6       230.2       0.4       232.9        2.3
                           90          242.8      255.0       254.7       0.3       258.1        3.1
                           Overall AAD, C                                 2.2                    3.8
                                     ◦
            Riazi–Daubert and Daubert’s methods and calculate AAD for  data are similar to the equations developed by Daubert [2, 23]
            each method.                                          to convert ASTM or SD to TBP as given in this section. The
                                                                  equations are summarized as following:
            Solution—The Riazi–Daubert methods do not provide a di-
            rect conversion from SD to TBP, but one can use Eqs. (3.18)    ASTM D 86(50 vol%) = 255.4 + 0.79424
            and (3.19) to convert SD to ASTM D 86 and then Eq. (3.14)  (3.26)  [SD(50 wt%) − 255.4] 1.0395
            should be used to convert ASTM to TBP data. From Eq. (3.19)
            and use of SD at 10% and 50% points, the value of param-  where SD (50 wt%) and ASTM D 86 (50 vol%) are tempera-
            eter F is calculated as 0.8287. Value of SD temperature at  tures at 50% distilled in kelvin. The difference between adja-
            50 wt% is 168.9 C, from Eq. (3.18) with appropriate constants  cent cut points is calculated from the following equation as
                        ◦
            in Table 3.5 one can obtain ASTM D 86 (50%) = 166.3 C.  given by the API-TDB [2].
                                                            ◦
            Substituting this value for ASTM into Eq. (3.14) gives TBP                        F
            (50 vol%) = 167.7 C, while the experimental value as given  (3.27)         U i = ET i
                           ◦
            in Table 3.10 is 166.7 C. The AD is then calculated as  where
                                ◦
            167.7−166.7 = 1 C. Daubert’s method for conversion of SD  U i = difference in ASTM D 86 temperatures between
                          ◦
            to TBP is direct and is presented through Eqs. (3.23)–(3.25).  two cut points, K (or C)
                                                                                            ◦
            According to Eq. (3.23), TBP (50%) = SD (50%) = 168.9 C,  T i = observed difference in SD temperatures between
                                                            ◦
            which gives an AD of 2.2 C for this point. A summary of com-  two cut points, K (or C)
                                ◦
                                                                                            ◦
            plete calculation results is given in Table 3.10. The overall AAD  E, F = constants varying for each cut point and are given
            for Eqs. (3.14) and (3.18) is 4.8, while for Eqs. (3.23)–(3.25)  in Table 3.11
            is 2.2 C.
                ◦
                                                                   To determine the ASTM D 86 temperature at any percent
                                                                  distilled, calculations should begin with 50% ASTM D 86 tem-
              Results presented in Example 3.4 show that Eqs. (3.23)–  perature and addition or subtraction of the proper tempera-
            (3.25) are more accurate than Eqs. (3.14) and (3.18) for the  ture difference U i .
            conversion of SD to TBP. One of the reasons for such a result
            is that the sample presented in Table 3.10 to evaluate these  ASTM D 86(0%) = ASTM D 86(50%)
            methods is taken from the same data bank used to develop                      − U 4 − U 5 − U 6
            correlations of Eqs. (3.23)–(3.25). In addition these equations
            provide a direct conversion of SD to TBP. However, one should  ASTM D 86(10%) = ASTM D 86(50%)
            realize that Eqs. (3.23)–(3.25) are based on only 19 datasets                  − U 4 − U 5
            and this limits the application of these equations. While Eqs.
                                                                          ASTM D 86(30%) = ASTM D 86(50%) − U 4
            (3.14), (3.18), and (3.19) are based on much larger data banks  (3.28)
            with wider range of application. As available data on both    ASTM D 86(70%) = ASTM D 86(50%) + U 3
            SD and TBP are very limited, a concrete recommendation on     ASTM D 86(90%) = ASTM D 86(50%)
            superiority of these two approaches cannot be made at this
            time.                                                                          + U 3 + U 2
                                                                          ASTM D 86(100%) = ASTM D 86(50%)
            3.2.2.2.3 SD to ASTM D 86 Conversion—Equations to                               + U 3 + U 2 + U 1
            convert SD (ASTM D 2887) distillation data to ASTM D 86
                                                                  This method is applicable to fractions with ASTM D 86 50%
                                                                                         ◦
                                                                                                   ◦
                   TABLE 3.9—Correlation constants for Eq. (3.24).  points in the range of 65–315 C (150–600 F). The average ab-
                   Cut point                 Maximum allowable    solute deviation for this method as reported by the API-TDB
               i    range, %   C       D          W i , C         [2] is about 6 C for some 125 samples and approximately 850
                                                                            ◦
                                                    ◦
               1    100–95  0.03849  1.9733        15             data points. Predicted ASTM temperatures at 0 and 100% are
               2     95–90  0.90427  0.8723        20             the least accurate values followed by values at 10 and 90%
               3     90–70  0.37475  1.2938        40
               4     70–50  0.25088  1.3975        40             points as is shown in the following example.
               5     50–30  0.08055  1.6988        40
               6     30–10  0.02175  2.0253        40             Example 3.5—Experimental ASTM D 2887 (SD) and ASTM
               7     10–0   0.20312  1.4296        20
               Source: Taken with permission from Refs. [2, 23].  D 86 distillation data for a petroleum fraction are given in
               a Temperatures are approximated to nearest 5.      Table 3.11 as taken from the API-TDB [2]. Predict the ASTM
          --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130