Page 92 - Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition
P. 92

74                         Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition



                                    I
                               P, =j kl(l-ul)kl-’(1-*2)kzdUI                     (3.69)
                                                          ,
                                    0
                     where

                               u;(f) = [pd’(<  1 mi)d<                           (3.70)
                     andpdz((lmi) is the density function of < = d2 for ai. As seen in (3.70), u&)
                     is the probability of a sample from ai falling in 0 I < < t.  Thus, u (t) = l--~~
                                                                             I
                                 in
                     and u2(r) =E~ the d-space when the threshold is chosen at d2 = f.  In (3.69),
                     du,,  (l-uIf’-’,  and  (1-u2$’  represent  the  probability  of  one  of  kl ol-
                     samples  falling  in  f 5 < < r +At, kl-1 of  al-samples  falling  in  f +At I
                     < < 00, and all k2 m2-samples falling in  t + Ar I &  < 00 respectively.  The pro-
                     duct of  these  three  gives  the  probability  of  the  combined event.  Since the
                     acquisition of  any one of the kl ol-samples is a correct classification, the pro-
                     bability is multiplied by  k I.  The integration is taken with respect to f from 0
                     to 00, that is, with respect to u I  from 0 to  1.



                                                TABLE 3-2




                                          Ed            1  -Pa  (%)
                                   (%o)   (%)
                                                k1 =k2 =5    k1  =k2=20
                                    1.0   10.0       0.9          0.6
                                    5.0   24.0       8.9          4.4
                                   10.0   32.0      17.6         14.9
                                   20.0   42.0      34.2         32.0



                          Table 3-2 shows (l-Po)’s for Data I-I and n =20.  Specifying &x as 1, 5,
                      10, and 20  %,  we  computed the corresponding llkfll’s,  from which E~’S were
                      obtained assuming that  both  pc,l((I~l) and pdz(<lw) in  (3.70) are normal.
                      Then, the  integrations of  (3.69) and  (3.70) were  carried  out  numerically for
                      normal pd’(< I wj)’s. Table 3-2 indicates that the ranking procedure is effective,
                      particularly for small E~’s. Also, the errors are smaller for larger k I  and k2 ’s.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97