Page 244 - Petroleum Production Engineering, A Computer-Assisted Approach
P. 244

Guo, Boyun / Computer Assited Petroleum Production Engg 0750682701_chap15 Final Proof page 242 22.12.2006 6:14pm




               15/242  PRODUCTION ENHANCEMENT
               nosseir, m.a., darwich, t.a., sayyouh, m.h., and sallaly,  15.2 Consider a gas well producing 50 bbl/day of water
                                                                   3
                 m.e. A new approach for accurate prediction of loading  and 0:2ft of sand through a 2.441-in. ID tubing
                 in gas wells under different flowing conditions. SPE  against a wellhead pressure of 600 psia and tempera-
                 Prod. Facilities November 2000;15(4):245.  ture of 80 8F. Suppose the tubing string is set at a
               turner, r.g., hubbard, m.g., and dukler, a.e. Analysis  depth of 9,000 ft and geothermal gradient is
                                                            0.01 8F/ft, estimate the minimum gas production
                 and prediction of minimum flow rate for the continu-  rate before the gas well gets loaded.
                 ous removal of liquids from gas wells. JPT November  15.3 Consider a gas well producing 80 bbl/day of water
                                                                   3
                 1969, Trans. AIME 1969;246:1475.           and 0:1ft of sand through a 1.995-in. ID tubing
                                                            against a wellhead pressure of 400 psia and tempera-
                                                            ture of 70 8F. Suppose the tubing string is set at a
               Problems                                     depth of 7,000 ft and geothermal gradient is
                                                            0.01 8F/ft, estimate the minimum gas production
               15.1 Consider a gas well producing 50 bbl/d of condensate  rate before the gas well gets loaded.
                   and 0.1 cubic foot of sand through a 2.441-in. I.D.  15.4 Consider a gas well producing 70 bbl/day of oil and
                                                                3
                   tubing against a wellhead pressure of 500 psia. Sup-  0:1ft of sand through a 1.995-in. ID tubing against a
                   pose the tubing string is set at a depth of 8,000 ft, use  wellhead pressure of 600 psia and temperature of
                   the following data and estimate the minimum gas  80 8F. Suppose the tubing string is set at a depth of
                   production rate before the gas well gets loaded.  6,000 ft and geothermal gradient is 0.01 8F/ft, esti-
                                                            mate the minimum gas production rate before the gas
                     Gas-specific gravity:  0:75 (air ¼ 1)  well gets loaded.
                     Hole inclination:  0 degrees
                     Wellhead temperature:  60 8F
                     Geothermal gradient:  0.01 8F/ft
                     Condensate gravity:  60 8API
                     Water-specific gravity:  1:07 (water ¼ 1)
                     Solid-specific gravity:  2:65 (water ¼ 1)
                     Oil–gas interface tension: 20 dyne/cm
                     Tubing wall roughness:  0.000015 in.
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249