Page 459 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology

9781412934633-Chap-28 1/10/09 8:58 AM Page 430

430 THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY

provoke or avoid conflict. The fact that REFERENCES
address is variable at the level of the individ-
ual, rather than determined by one’s demo- Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Heritage, John (eds.)
graphic profile, is not recognized in the (1984) Structures of Social Action. Studies in
Brown and Gilman model, which has shaped Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
the field of address since its publication. University Press.
Moreover, often considered to be but a small Bing, Janet (1995) ‘Killing Us Softly: Ambiguous
part of the larger field of politeness, address Markers of Power and Solidarity’, in
M. Bucholtz, A. Liang, and L. Sutton (eds.)
is often under-analyzed and insufficiently
Communication In, Through, and Across
theorized. The model presented here offers a
Cultures. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and
framework for understanding how individu-
Language Group. pp. 44–9.
als create identities for themselves, as indi- Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and
viduals and as co-interlocutors, through Kasper, Gabriele (1989) Cross-Cultural
conversational strategies and address form Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies.
choices. It further offers a window into Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
understanding how the choices made mini- Braun, Friederike (1988) Terms of Address:
mize or maximize the speakers’ ability to Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various
achieve cooperation or conflict. Space limita- Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de
tions prohibit a more thorough description of Gruyter.
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen (1978)
how the ‘accordion effect’ serves to discon-
‘Universals in Language Usage: Politeness
nect negotiated meaning from the mooring of
Phenomena’, in Esther Goody (ed.)
the conventionalized interpretation, a more
Questions and Politeness. Cambridge:
precise description of the third layer of Cambridge University Press.
analysis (the personal and social identifica- Brown, Roger W. and Gilman, Albert ([1960]
tion processes, conversational goals, consid- 1972) ‘The Pronouns of Power and
eration of face needs, etc.), a fuller illustration Solidarity’, in Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.)
of how these social and individual identities Language and Social Context. NY: Penguin
are created and shaped by various address Books. pp. 252–82.
form strategies, and a more complete expla- Coates, Jennifer (1986) Women, Men and
nation of the model’s usefulness in analyzing Language. NY: Longman.
de Oliveira, Medeiros, Sandi Michele (1985)
address form systems which do not appear to
A Model of Address Form Negotiation:
require this degree of intricacy.
A Sociolinguistic Study of Continental
This model may appear unnecessarily
Portuguese. PhD dissertation, Austin: University
complicated for researchers of languages with of Texas.
one or two pronouns of address, as is the case de Oliveira, Sandi Michele (1993) ‘Um Modelo
with most European languages. However, it Psico-sociolinguístico de Formas de
has been demonstrated that the distinctions Tratamento’, Actas do VIII Encontro da
~
which can be made in Portuguese through Associaçao Portuguesa de Linguística,
nominal pronouns are made in other lan- Outubro 1991. Lisbon: Faculdade de Letras
guages through vocatives. Unfortunately, da Universidade de Lisboa. pp. 330–42.
many studies of address focus on pronouns de Oliveira, Sandi Michele (1994) ‘Winning
Friends and Influencing People Abroad:
while ignoring vocatives. Perhaps researchers
Using Native Speakers’ Communicative
find the number of nominal forms daunting,
Strategies’, Intercultural Communication
or the shades of meaning too subtle for analy-
Studies, IV(1): 23–44.
~
sis using the analytical models most often de Oliveira, Sandi Michele (1995a) ‘Reflexoes
referenced. This model offers greater explica- Sobre Poder e Solidariedade’, Actas do X
~
tive power, as it allows for the integration of Encontro da Associaçao Portuguesa de
pronouns of address and nominal forms Linguística. Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa.
within a single interpretative framework. pp. 407–18.