Page 348 - A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy Systems
P. 348

Chapter 17 • Energy and Carbon Intensities of Stored Solar Photovoltaic Energy  353



                 17.2  Key Characteristics for Storage

                 energy storage incurs energetic costs and emits carbon to the atmosphere. direct emissions
                 of carbon are those associated with the round-trip efficiency and operation of the storage
                 device. Indirect emissions are those resulting from the process of mining the materials and
                 manufacturing the storage and flexible generation technologies. The energetic and carbon
                 intensity values for energy storage technologies were obtained from life cycle assessment
                 (LCA) and net energy analysis (neA); studies [14–17]. Grid-scale storage requires safety,
                 affordability, reliability, longevity, and efficiency. Technologies that satisfy these criteria
                 include four  electrochemical storage  technologies—lithium-ion (Li-ion),  sodium sulfur,
                 traditional lead-acid (PbA), vanadium redox flow batteries (VrB)—and two geological stor-
                 age technologies—PHS, and compressed air energy storage (CAeS)—in this analysis.
                   Key net energy and carbon data are listed in Table 17.2. The energy intensity per unit
                 energy storage capacity, ε s  [(kWh e )/(kWh e )], depends on the technology’s depth of discharge
                 (D), its total number of charge-discharge cycles (λ), and its cradle-to-gate embodied electri-
                 cal energy requirement per unit capacity of energy delivered to storage (CTG e ). embodied
                 energy accounts for energy expended in mining raw resources, manufacturing the device,
                                                                                               −1
                 and delivering the device to point of use. The per cycle carbon intensity [g CO 2 eq(kWh) ]
                 for storage technologies were calculated by adding capital (GHG s,cap ) and operational green-
                 house gas (GHG s,op ) emissions per unit of electrical energy delivered per cycle.
                   A critical attribute of an energy storage technology is its round-trip efficiency, η. The
                 carbon intensity of the discharged electricity is ≥1/η times the carbon intensity of the
                 input electricity. using storage increases the carbon intensity of delivered electricity by a


                 Table 17.2  Data Used in Net Energy Analysis of Storage Technologies
                 Technology  CAES       Li-ion     NaS         PbA        PHS         VRB
                 GHG s,cap  (kg   19 400  600 960  687 500     153 850    35 700      161 400
                  (MW h) )
                       −1
                 GHG s,op  (kg   288    0          0           0          1.8         3.3
                  (MW h) )
                       −1
                 Discharge   1          0.8        0.8         0.8        1           1
                  depth (D)
                 Cycles (λ)  25 000     6 000      4 700       700        25 000      10 000
                 Efficiency (η)  0.7 (1.36)  0.9   0.75        0.9        0.85        0.75
                            22          136        145         96         30          208
                 CT G e
                 Carbon multi-  0.735 a  1.111     1.333       1.111      1.764       1.333
                  plier (χ)
                 Energy inten-  0.00088  0.028     0.039       0.17       0.0012      0.072
                  sity (ε s )

                 Definitions are in the text. Detailed analysis and references in Supplementary Materials.
                 a CAES operation delivers more electricity than enters storage by combusting natural gas.
                 Sources: Denholm P, Kulcinski GL. Life cycle energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions from large scale energy storage
                 systems. Energy Convers Management 2004;45:2153–72, Sullivan J.L, Gaines L. A review of battery life-cycle analysis: state of
                 knowledge and critical needs ANL/ESD/10-7. Technical report. Oak Ridge, TN: Argonne National Laboratory; 2010.
   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353