Page 121 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 121

112                           2. MARINE SEISMIC DATA ACQUISITION
































           FIG. 2.67  A comparison of (A) conventional and (B) P-cable seismic data. Data Courtesy of TGS.
                                                           A high S/N ratio can be achieved by increas-
                  2.5 DATA ACQUISITION
                        PARAMETERS                      ing the signal level while trying to reduce the
                                                        noise amplitudes. A proper determination of
                                                        source and receiver geometry may reduce the
              The suitable selection of data acquisition
                                                        source-generated noise amplitudes as well as
           parameters both in 2D and 3D seismics widely  spatial aliasing. A good temporal resolution is
           affects the quality of the collected data. The  achieved by recording seismic data with a wide
           determination process of acquisition parameters  frequency bandwidth, which involves both low-
           is termed seismic survey design, the main pur-  and high-frequency components at the same
           pose of which is to optimize the survey to obtain  time to resolve the upper and lower boundaries
           the most suitable seismic data that matches the  of the target. The bandwidth of the data at its
           requirements of the survey. In practice, these  higher frequency end is limited by the source
           parameters are determined in conjunction with  and receiver ghost notches, and different acqui-
           the requirements of the survey, and in general
                                                        sition geometries are introduced to eliminate
           they are selected to produce a suitable source
                                                        the negative effect of, especially, receiver ghosts
           signal and to record the best quality data with
                                                        to improve the seismic signal bandwidth
           a minimal noise component, providing that they
                                                        (Section 2.2.3). A good data coverage requires
           suit the cost and HSE (health, safety, and envi-
                                                        a suitable definition of inline and crossline
           ronment) requirements for the entire survey.
                                                        receiver spacing to avoid spatial aliasing.
              Good seismic data can be defined by its three
                                                           A successful seismic survey design provides
           specific characteristics (Ashton et al., 1994):
                                                        for obtaining the goals of the conducted seismic
           • High S/N ratio                             survey in a cost-effective manner, within the pre-
           • Good temporal and spatial resolution       determined time schedule of the survey. In the
           • Good spatial coverage for 3D               selection of suitable survey parameters, the
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126