Page 256 - Adsorption, Ion Exchange & Catalysis- 2007, Elsevier - Copy
P. 256

Else_AIEC-INGLE_cH004.qxd  7/1/2006  6:53 PM  Page 252
                    252                                          4. Adsorption and Ion Exchange


                                                     Table 4.6

                                     Alternative adsorption media (Noble and Terry, 2004)
                                          Typical adsorbates      Cost of adsorber
                                                                                (1998)
                                                                                ($/lb)
                    Activated carbon  Nearly all or ganics  1
                    Modified clays  Emulsified oil and grease  1.5
                    Polymeric resins  Chlorinated and nonchlorinated OCs V  8–35
                    Zeolites        Chlorinated and nonchlorinated OCs V  7–10



                                                     Table 4.7
                                         erry, Adsorbent types (Noble and T2004)
                    Adsorbent  Advantages  Disadvantages  Applications

                    Activated carbon  Cheapest    Difficult regeneration,  Removal of organics
                                       hydrophobic  fire risk during   from aqueous and
                                       adsorbent    regeneration  gaseous streams
                    Silica gel,  Higher capacity than  Not so efve in fecti  Drying of gas
                      activated alumina  other materials   removing traces of   streams (both),
                                       (e.g. zeolites)  water from gases  hydrocarbon
                                                                              removal from
                                                                              gases (silica gel)
                    Zeolites   Separations can be   Lower capacity than  Dehydration,
                                       based both on    many other adsorbents  air separation
                                       polarity and geometry
                    Silicalite  f  Can be burned of  xpensi More eve than  Removal of organics
                                       more easily than   activated carbon  from gaseous
                                       activated carbon           streams
                    Polymer adsorbents   No fouling problems  xpensi v Much more ee  Removal of organics
                      (usually styrene)  compared to actiated  v  than activated carbon  from gaseous
                                       carbon                            streams
                    Biosorbents   No regeneration needed  Lower effective   Removal of organics
                      (activated sludge       capacity than other   from gaseous
                      on a porous support)  adsorbents  streams





                    such fires. However, such effects are not only connected to the VOC to be removed but also
                    to the type of the adsorbent. Specif polymers are usually used at mild temperatures, , ically
                    which do not allow bed fires. On the other hand, although zeolites are not flammable, the y
                    can contribute to intense heat release by promoting oxidation reactions after a minimum
                    temperature has been provided for the start of the catalytic beha in case of , . Normally vior
                    ire,
                    a bed f the pore size of the zeolite is not altered by temperature (up to a point) since
                    zeolites are resistant to temperature rise as mentioned above. However, the pore size of the
                    , zeolite may be decreased leading to an increase in its density if the temperature surpasses
                    the meta-stable range.
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261