Page 411 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 411

392               As the rate-determining step is endothermic with a late TS, application of Hammond’s
                       postulate (Section 3.3.2.2) indicates that the TS should resemble the product of the
     CHAPTER 4         first step, the carbocation intermediate. Ionization is facilitated by factors that lower
     Nucleophilic Substitution  the energy of the carbocation or raise the energy of the reactant. The rate of ionization
                       depends primarily on reactant structure, including the identity of the leaving group, and
                       the solvent’s ionizing power. The most important electronic effects are stabilization
                       of the carbocation by electron release, the ability of the leaving group to accept the
                       electron pair from the covalent bond that is broken, and the capacity of the solvent to
                       stabilize the charge separation that develops in the TS. Steric effects are also significant
                       because of the change in coordination that occurs on ionization. The substituents
                       are spread apart as ionization proceeds, so steric compression in the reactant favors
                       ionization. On the other hand, geometrical constraints that preclude planarity of the
                       carbocation are unfavorable and increase the energy required for ionization.
                           The ionization process is very sensitive to solvent effects, which are dependent
                       on the charge type of the reactants. These relationships follow the general pattern
                       for solvent effects discussed in Section 3.8.1. Ionization of a neutral substrate results
                       in charge separation, and solvent polarity has a greater effect at the TS than for the
                       reactants. Polar solvents lower the energy of the TS more than solvents of lower
                       polarity. In contrast, ionization of cationic substrates, such as trialkylsulfonium ions,
                       leads to dispersal of charge in the TS and reaction rates are moderately retarded by
                       more polar solvents because the reactants are more strongly solvated than the TS.
                       These relationships are illustrated in Figure 4.2.
                           Stereochemical information can add detail to the mechanistic picture of the S 1
                                                                                          N
                       substitution reaction. The ionization step results in formation of a carbocation intermed-
                                                    2
                       iate that is planar because of its sp hybridization. If the carbocation is sufficiently
                       long-lived under the reaction conditions to diffuse away from the leaving group, it
                       becomes symmetrically solvated and gives racemic product. If this condition is not
                       met, the solvation is dissymmetric and product can be obtained with net retention or
                       inversion of configuration, even though an achiral carbocation is formed. The extent
                       of inversion or retention depends on the specific reaction. It is frequently observed
                       that there is net inversion of configuration. The stereochemistry can be interpreted in
                       terms of three different stages of the ionization process. The contact ion pair represents





                           a                                   b



                                           ‡
                                      ΔG ‡
                                                                         ΔG ‡







                         Fig. 4.2. Solid line: polar solvent; dashed line: nonpolar solvent. (a) Solvent effects on R–X →
                         R + X . Polar solvents increase the rate by stabilization of the R ---X  −  transition state. (b)
                                                                        +
                          +
                              −
                         Solvent effect on R–X → R +X. Polar solvents decrease the rate because stabilization of R- - --X
                                                                                        +
                                       +
                                            +
                         transition state is less than for the more polar reactant.
   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416