Page 583 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 583

564               This elimination reaction is the reverse of acid-catalyzed hydration, which was
                       discussed in Section 5.2. Since a carbocation or closely related species is the inter-
     CHAPTER 5         mediate, the elimination step is expected to favor the more-substituted alkene. The
     Polar Addition    E1 mechanism also explains the trends in relative reactivity. Tertiary alcohols are the
     and Elimination
     Reactions         most reactive, and reactivity decreases going to secondary and primary alcohols. Also
                       in accord with the E1 mechanism is the fact that rearranged products are found in
                       cases where a carbocation intermediate would be expected to rearrange.

                                                                       R
                            CCHR'          R CCHR'                                      R
                          R 3                3
                                 +  H +                R CCHR'      R CCHR'      R 2 C  C
                                                        3
                                                                     2
                                                +
                             OH               O H 2       +           +                 R'
                           For some alcohols, exchange of the hydroxyl group with solvent competes with
                       dehydration. 301  This exchange indicates that the carbocation can undergo S 1 capture
                                                                                    N
                       in competition with elimination. Under conditions where proton removal is rate deter-
                       mining, it would be expected that a significant isotope effect would be seen, which is,
                       in fact, observed.


                                               H *
                                                      H SO 4
                                                       2
                                           PhCHCHPh           PhCH  CHPh
                                                       H O
                                                        2
                                             OH                  k /k D  = 1.8
                                                                  H
                                                                                       Ref. 302
                       5.10.5. Eliminations Reactions Not Involving C−H Bonds

                           The discussion of elimination processes thus far has focused on reactions that
                       involve removal of a proton bound to a ß-carbon, but it is the electrons in the C−H
                       bond that are essential to the elimination process. Compounds bearing other substituents
                       that can release electrons undergo  -eliminations. Many such reactions are known,
                       and they are frequently stereospecific.
                           Vicinal dibromides can be debrominated by certain reducing agents, including
                       iodide ion. The stereochemical course in the case of 1,1,2-tribromocyclohexane was
                       determined using a  82 Br-labeled sample prepared by anti addition of  82 Br to bromo-
                                                                                   2
                       cyclohexene. Exclusive anti elimination gave unlabeled bromocyclohexene, whereas
                       82
                         Br-labeled product resulted from syn elimination. Debromination with sodium iodide
                       was found to be cleanly an anti elimination. 303

                                              82
                                                Br
                                                        NaI
                                               82 Br                 Br
                                             Br
                                                                anti elimination
                                                                product

                       301
                          C. A. Bunton and D. R. Llewellyn, J. Chem. Soc., 3402 (1957); J. Manassen and F. S. Klein, J. Chem.
                          Soc., 4203 (1960).
                       302   D. S. Noyce, D. R. Hartter, and R. M. Pollack, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 3791 (1968).
                       303
                          C. L. Stevens and J. A. Valicenti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 838 (1965).
   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588