Page 66 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 66

π ∗                  π ∗                                           45

                                                             Nu –                         SECTION 1.2
                             π
                                        E +                                            Molecular Orbital
                                                                                      Theory and Methods
                                  (a)                  (b)
                                                         +
                          Interaction of ethene frontier orbitals with E  and Nu –
                          π ∗                    π ∗
                                                             Nu –
                                         E +
                           π                     π

                                  (c)                  (d)
                                                           +
                        Interaction of formaldehyde frontier orbitals with E  and Nu –
                        Fig. 1.20. PMO description of interaction of ethylene and
                                                                −
                                                +
                        formaldehyde with an electrophile  E   and a nucleophile  Nu  .

          The perturbations that arise as a nucleophile and an electrophile approach are sketched
          in Figure 1.20.
              The electrophilic species E must have a low-lying empty orbital. The strongest
                                    +
          interaction will be with the ethene   orbital and this leads to a stabilizing effect on the
          complex since the electrons are located in an orbital that is stabilized (Figure 1.20a).
          The same electrophilic species would lie further from the   orbital of formaldehyde
          since the formaldehyde orbitals are shifted to lower energy. As a result the mutual
          interaction with the formaldehyde HOMO will be weaker than in the case of ethene
          (Figure 1.20c). The conclusion is that an electrophile will undergo a greater stabi-
          lizing attraction on approaching ethene than it will on approaching formaldehyde. In
                       −
                                                       ∗
          the case of Nu , a strong bonding interaction with   of formaldehyde is possible
          (Figure 1.20d). In the case of ethene, the strongest interaction is with the HOMO of
          the nucleophile, but this is a destabilizing interaction since both orbitals are filled and
          the lowering of one orbital is canceled by the raising of the other (Figure 1.20b). Thus
          we conclude that a nucleophile with a high-lying HOMO will interact more favorably
          with formaldehyde than with ethene.
              The representations of nucleophilic attack on formaldehyde as involving the
          carbonyl LUMO and electrophilic attack on ethene as involving the HOMO also make
          a prediction about the trajectory of the approach of the reagents. The highest LUMO
          density is on carbon and it is oriented somewhat away from the oxygen. On the other
          hand, the ethene HOMO is the   orbital, which has maximum density at the midpoint
          above and below the molecular plane. Calculations of the preferred direction of attack
          of electrophilic and nucleophilic reagents are in accord with this representation, as
          shown below. 57



           57
             H. B. Bürgi, J. D. Dunitz, J. M. Lehn, and G. Wipff, Tetrahedron, 30, 1563 (1974); H. B. Bürgi,
             J. M. Lehn, and G. Wipff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 1956 (1974); K. N. Houk, M. N. Paddon-Row,
             N. G. Rondan, Y.D. Wu, F. K. Brown, D. C. Spellmeyer, J. T. Metz, Y. Li, and R. J. Loncarich,
             Science, 231, 1108 (1986).
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71