Page 893 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 893

In addition to the electronic effects of substituents, several other structural features  877
          affect the reactivity of dipolarophiles. Strain increases reactivity. Norbornene, for
          example, is consistently more reactive than cyclopentene in 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions.  SECTION 10.3
          Cyclopentene is also more reactive than cyclohexene. Conjugating substituents, such  1,3-Dipolar
                                                                                    Cycloaddition Reactions
          as the phenyl group in styrene, usually increase reactivity of dipolarophiles (compare
          styrene with 1-alkenes in Table 10.3).
              An interesting series of compounds for which a fairly broad range of data
          exists is diazomethane, methyl diazoacetate, and diethyl diazomalonate, in which each
          additional ester group should make the 1,3-dipole successively more electrophilic.
          The data are given in Table 10.4. We see that diazomethane is primarily nucle-
          ophilic in character, dropping sharply in reactivity from electrophilic to nucleophilic
          dipolarophiles. The other two reactants clearly show an ambiphilic reactivity. These
          reagents show increased reactivity with both EWG and ERG dipolarophiles, with the
          diazomalonate shifted somewhat more toward electrophilic character.
              Sustmann and Trill 118  summarized these and related reactivity relationships
          in terms of FMO theory and pointed out that 1,3-DPCA reactions could be
          of three types, depending on relative placement of the frontier orbitals: (A)
          HOMO   dipole -LUMO dipolarophile  dominant; (B)LUMO dipole -HOMO dipolarophile  dominant; (C)
          both HOMO-LUMO interactions are significant. The first type should be accelerated by
          ERG in the dipole and EWG in the dipolarophile. The second type should be facilitated
          by an EWG in the dipole and an ERG in the dipolarophile. These relationships suggest
          a parabolic substituent effect as the Type C reactions shift from LUMO dipolarophile  to
          mixed to HOMO dipolarophile  controlled. Figure 10.13 illustrates this relationship for aryl
          azides. The Hammett   is positive for reaction with nucleophilic enamines but negative
          for the electrophilic dipolarophile maleic anhydride, showing that the direction of the
          substituent effect depends on the relative importance of the two HOMO-LUMO inter-
          actions. The unfunctionalized alkenes cyclopentene and norbornene are nucleophilic
          in character, but less so than the enamine. Using a wider range of reactants, Sustmann
          and Trill demonstrated a parabolic rate relationship and developed a mathematical
          treatment in terms of FMO theory that provided a semiquantitative explanation of
          relative reactivity. 118  We pursue the application of FMO theory to the regiochemistry
          of the 1,3-DPCA reaction in more detail below.
              As with the D-A reaction, the concerted pericyclic mechanism can account for
          many aspects of the stereochemistry and regiochemistry of the 1,3-DPCA reaction.
          Most 1,3-DPCA reactions are highly stereospecific with respect to the dipolarophile.
          In one case, it was established that a pair of isomeric dipolarophiles both reacted




                        Table 10.4. Relative Reactivity for Diazo Compounds
                CH 2 =CHX         CH 2 N 2  a   RO 2 CCHN 2  b     RO 2 C  2 CN 2  c
               Acrylate         250 000           930                35
               1-Alkene             1              1                 1
               Styrene             100             2 5               1 5
               Vinyl ether          0 02           0 1               0 15
               Vinyl amine          0 07          470               620
               a. J. Geittner, R. Huisgen, and R. Sustmann, Tetrahedron Lett., 881 (1977).
               b. W. Bihlmaier, R. Huisgen, H.-U. Reissig and S. Voss, Tetrahedron Lett., 2621 (1979).
               c. H. U. Reissig, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Munich, 1978, as quoted in Ref. 114b.
   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898