Page 1113 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 1113

Scheme 12.9. Enantioselective Epoxidation of Allylic Alcohols           1089

                1 a      H   CH 2 OH  55 mol % Ti(O-i-Pr) 4 ,  H  CH OH                     SECTION 12.2
                                                                 2
                                  65 mol % (+)-diethyl tartrate                         Addition of Oxygen at
                                                                H
                   CH (CH )  H        2 equiv t-BuOOH  CH 3 (CH )  O                   Carbon-Carbon Double
                     3
                         2 2
                                                          2 2
                                                                78% yield,                       Bonds
                                                                97% e.e.
                2 b           H   CH 2 OH  (+)-diisopropyl tartrate  H  CH 2 OH
                                                    ,
                                             Ti(O-i-Pr) 4
                   CH 2  CH(CH )  H                       CH  CH(CH )  O  H
                             2 3
                                              t-BuOOH
                                                                    2 3
                                                            2
                                                                        80% yield,
                                                                        95% e.e.
                3 c              (+)-diethyl tartrate  CH 2 OH
                        CH OH
                           2
                                Ti(O-i-Pr) , t-BuOOH  O
                                       4
                                     MS 4A                77% yield,
                                                          93% e.e.
                4 d                                  H   CH 2 OH
                   H    CH OH 25 mol % (+)-diethyl tartrate
                          2
                                 20 mol % Ti(O-i-Pr) 4    CH 3
                  CH 3  CH 3                        CH 3  O   77% yield,
                                     t-BuOOH
                                                              94 e.e.
                5 e                    7.4 mol % equiv(+)-diethyl      CH OH
                                                                         2
                  CH 3   H  CH 3  CH 2 OH    tartrate     CH 3  H  H
                   CH 3  CH CH 2  H      5 mol % Ti(O-i-Pr) 4  CH 3  CH CH 2 O  H 95% yield,
                           2
                                                                  2
                                          t-BuOOH, 4A MS
                                                                         91% e.e.
                6 f          O         12 mol % (–)-diethyl tartrate,  O
                                          10 mol %Ti(O-i-Pr) 4
                  TBDMSO           CH OH     t-BuOOH     TBDMSO           CH OH
                                      2
                                                                             2
                            O                                      O    O
                                                                       77% yield
                7 g  CH CH 3
                      3
                                   1.4 equiv (–)-diisopropyl tartrate, CH CH 3
                                                              3
                              CH OH    1.15 equiv Ti(O-i-Pr)4
                                2
                                                                     CH OH
                  O   O                                                 2
                                            t-BuOOH      O   O     O
                                             4A MS
                    Ar
                      Ar = 4-methoxyphenyl                 Ar        85% yield
                a. J. G. Hill and K. B. Sharpless, Org. Synth., 63, 66 (1985).
                b. B. E. Rossiter, T. Katsuki, and K. B. Sharpless, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103, 464 (1981).
                c. Y. Gao, R. M. Hanson. J. M. Klunder, S. Y. Ko, H. Masamune, and K. B. Sharpless, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109,
                  5765 (1987).
                d. D. A. Evans, S. L. Bender, and J. Morris, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 2506 (1988).
                e. R. M. Hanson and K. B. Sharpless, J. Org. Chem., 51, 1922 (1986).
                f. A. K. Ghosh and Y. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 64, 2789 (1999).
                g. J. A. Marshall, Z.-H. Lu, and B. A. Johns, J. Org. Chem., 63, 817 (1998).
                                                      66
              chiral salen-type ligands have also been explored. These epoxidations are not always
              stereospecific with respect to the alkene geometry, which is attributed to an electron
              transfer mechanism that involves a radical intermediate.
              66
                 N. Hosoya, R. Irie, and T. Katsuki, Synlett, 261 (1993); S. Chang, R. M. Heid, and E. N. Jacobsen,
                 Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 669 (1994).
   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118