Page 1109 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 1109

planar, arrangement in the TS for oxygen transfer. (2) The orientation of the alkyl  1085
              group of the peroxide plays a key role in the enantioselectivity, which is consistent
              with the experimental observation that less bulky hydroperoxides give much lower  SECTION 12.2
              enantioselectivity. (3) The C–O bond of the allylic alcohol bisects the Ti–O bond  Addition of Oxygen at
                                                                                       Carbon-Carbon Double
              formed by the water and peroxy ligands. (4) The tartrate groups at the active catalytic  Bonds
              center are in equatorial positions and do not coordinate to titanium. This implies a
              conformation flip of the diolate ring as part of the activation process, since the ester
              groups are in axial positions in the dimeric catalyst.

              Visual models, additional information and exercises on Sharpless Epoxidation
              can be found in the Digital Resource available at: Springer.com/carey-sundberg.

                  Owing to the importance of the allylic hydroxy group in coordinating the reactant
              to the titanium, the structural relationship between the double bond and the hydroxy
              group is crucial. Homoallylic alcohols can be oxidized but the degree of enantioselec-
              tivity is reduced. Interestingly, the facial selectivity is reversed from that observed with
              allylic alcohols. 60  Compounds lacking a coordinating hydroxy group are not reactive
              under the standard reaction conditions.
                  Substituted allylic alcohols also exhibit diastereoselectivity. A DFT study has
              examined the influence of alkyl substituents in the allylic alcohol on the stereo-
              selectivity. 61  Alcohols 3a, 3b, and 3c were studied. The catalytic entity was modeled
              by Ti OH  -CH OOH. This approach neglects the steric influence of the t-butyl and
                       4   3
              tartrate ester groups and focuses on the structural features of the allylic alcohols, which
              are placed on the catalytic core in their minimum energy conformation. Figure 12.5
              shows these conformations. The TS structural parameters were derived from the Wu-
              Lai TS model (see Figure 12.4). The relative energies of the TSs leading to the erythro
              and threo products for each alcohol were compared (Figure 12.6). A solvent dielectric
              chosen to simulate CH Cl was used. The general conclusion drawn from this study is
                                2
                                   2
              that the reactant conformation is the critical feature determining the diastereoselectivity
              of the epoxidation.
                                                               CH
                                               CH                 3
                                   CH 3          3        CH 3
                              CH 3               OH              OH
                                     OH
                                               CH 3            CH 3
                                  3a            3b            3c

                  In allylic alcohols with A 1	3  strain, the main product is syn. A methyl substituent
                 4
              at R leads to the methyl group being positioned anti to the complexed oxidant. If R 4
              is hydrogen, a TS with the methyl group in an “inside” position is favored, as shown
              in Figure 12.6.
                  The two TSs for 3a are shown in Figure 12.7. TS A also has a more favorable
              orientation of the spiro ring structure. The ideal angle is 90 , at which point the two

              rings are perpendicular. This angle is 78 2 in TS A and 36 2 in TS B. TS A has




              a O(1)−C(2)−C(3)−C(4) angle of 35 6 , TS B has a corresponding angle of 96 1 .
              Based on the reactant conformational profile, this will introduce about 0.7 kcal more
              60   B. E. Rossiter and K. B. Sharpless, J. Org. Chem., 49, 3707 (1984).
              61
                 M. Cui, W. Adam, J. H. Shen, X. M. Luo, X. J. Tan, K. X. Chen, R. Y. Ji, and H. L. Jiang, J. Org.
                 Chem., 67, 1427 (2002).
   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114