Page 508 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 508

482
                                                                         F(3)
      CHAPTER 6                            C(3)
      Concerted
      Cycloadditions,                                    C(1)
      Unimolecular                            C(2)                      B(1)
      Rearrangements, and
      Thermal Eliminations

                                                                              F(2)
                                                          O(1)
                                        C(4)
                                                                       F(1)


                                  Fig. 6.4. Structure of the BF 3 –2-methylpropenal complex. Reproduced
                                  from Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 6945 (1992), by permission of Elsevier.

                           The stereoselectivity of any particular reaction depends on the details of the
                       structure of the TS. The structures of several enone–Lewis acid complexes have
                       been determined by X-ray crystallography. 25  The site of complexation is the carbonyl
                       oxygen, which maintains a trigonal geometry, but with somewhat expanded angles


                        130 –140 	. The Lewis acid is normally anti to the larger carbonyl substituent.
                       Boron trifluoride complexes are tetrahedral, but Sn(IV) and Ti(IV) complexes can
                       be tetrahedral, bipyramidal or octahedral. The structure of the 2-methylpropenal–BF
                                                                                            3
                       complex in Figure 6.4 is illustrative. 26  Chelation can favor a particular structure. For
                       example, O-acryloyl lactates adopt a chelated hexacoordinate structure with TiCl ,as
                                                                                         4
                       shown in Figure 6.5. 27
                           Computational studies have explored the differences between thermal and Lewis
                       acid–catalyzed D-A reactions. Ab initio calculations (HF/6-31G ) have been used to
                                                                           ∗
                       compare the energy of four possible TSs for the D-A reaction of the BF complex
                                                                                    3
                       of propenal with 1,3-butadiene. 16d  The TSs are designated endo and exo and s-cis
                       and s-trans. The latter designations refer to the dienophile conformation. The results
                       are summarized in Figure 6.6. In the thermal reaction, the endo-cis and exo-cis TSs
                       are nearly equal in total and activation energies. In the BF -catalyzed reaction, the
                                                                         3



                                                                     Cl1
                                                          O3
                                                      C4
                                                 O4
                                                                  Ti
                                                           C12
                                                                  O1
                                                          O2
                                                            C1
                                                                C2 C3
                                            Fig. 6.5. Structure of the TiCl 4 complex
                                            of O-acryloyl ethyl lactate. Reproduced
                                            from Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 24, 112
                                            (1985), by permission of Wiley-VCH.
                        25   S. Shambayati, W. E. Crowe, and S. L. Schreiber, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 29, 256 (1990).
                        26   E. J. Corey, T.-P. Loh, S. Sarshar, and M. Azimioara, Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 6945 (1992).
                        27
                          T. Poll, J. O. Metter, and G. Helmchen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 24, 112 (1985).
   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513