Page 509 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 509

483
                             1.410                               3
                                    1.367
                       1.392     3                                                          SECTION 6.1
                             4     2                                2
                           5                                  4                         Diels-Alder Reactions
                              2.652
                                                           5
                                      1.225
                       2.040         7                       2.958
                              6  1                     2.064  6  1
                                                                    7
                             1.397
                                     1.451
                                                             1.402
                                      Relative Energies and Activation Energies
                         Thermal  

E 298  
G 298  BF 3 -catalyzed  

E 298  
G 298
                                                                      ∗
                                            ∗
                         Endo-cis  0.00  32 7    Endo-cis   0.00    23.2
                         Endo-trans  1.24  33 9  Endo-trans  2.25   25.7
                         Exo-cis  0.06   32 7    Exo-cis    1.72    24.3
                         Exo-trans  1.93  34 5   Exo-trans  5.61    28.3
                         Fig. 6.6. Relative energies of four possible transition structures for Diels-
                         Alder reaction of 1,3-butadiene and propenal, with and without BF 3
                         catalyst. Geometric parameters of the most stable transition structures
                         (endo-cis) are shown. Adapted from J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 2415 (1998),
                         by permission of the American Chemical Society.

              endo-cis TS is favored by 1.7 kcal/mol. The calculated 
G is reduced by nearly
                                                                ∗
              10 kcal/mol for the catalyzed reaction, relative to the thermal reaction. The catalyzed
              reaction shows significantly greater asynchronicity than the thermal reaction. In the
              BF -catalyzed reaction, the forming bond distances are 2.06 and 2.96 Å, whereas in
                3
              the thermal reaction they are 2.04 and 2.65 Å. (See Topic 10.1 of Part A for discussion
              of asynchronicity.)
                  A similar study was done with methyl acrylate as the dienophile. 28  The uncat-
              alyzed and catalyzed TSs are shown in Figure 6.7. As with propenal, the catalyzed
              reaction is quite asynchronous with C(2)−C(3) bonding running ahead of C(1)−C(6)
              bonding. In this system, there is a shift from favoring the exo-s-cis TS in the thermal
              reaction to the endo-s-trans TS in the catalyzed reaction. A large component in this
              difference is the relative stability of the free and complexed dienophile. The free
              dienophile favors the s-cis conformation, whereas the BF complex favors the s-trans
                                                            3
              conformation.

                                                     F B
                                                      3
                                            OCH 3      O
                                     CH 2  O            OCH 3
                                         s-cis       s-trans



              Visual models, additional information and exercises on the Diels-Alder Reaction
              can be found in the Digital Resource available at: Springer.com/carey-sundberg.

                  In terms of both the effect of substituents and Lewis acid catalysis, the
              rates of D-A reactions increase as the donor-acceptor character of the reactive
              28
                 J. I. Garcia, J. A. Mayoral, and L. Salvatella, Tetrahedron, 53, 6057 (1997).
   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514