Page 620 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 620

594              out either photochemically or thermally. Although the reaction usually does not proceed
                       by a concerted mechanism, there are some special cases in which concerted elimination
      CHAPTER 6
                       is possible. We consider these cases first and then move on to the more general case. An
      Concerted        interesting illustration of the importance of orbital symmetry effects is the contrasting
      Cycloadditions,
      Unimolecular     stability of azo compounds 23 and 24. Compound 23 decomposes to norbornene
      Rearrangements, and  and nitrogen only above 100 C. In contrast 24 eliminates nitrogen immediately on

      Thermal Eliminations

                       preparation, even at −78 C. 312
                                        N  > 100°C                    N  < –78°C
                                       N                            N
                                    23                            24

                       The reason for this difference is that if 23 were to undergo a concerted elimination
                       it would have to follow the forbidden (high-energy)  2  +2    pathway. For 24, the
                                                                     s    s
                       elimination can take place by the allowed  2  +4    pathway. Thus, these reactions
                                                             s    s
                       are the reverse, respectively, of the  2  + 2    and  2  + 4    cycloadditions, and
                                                             s
                                                                           s
                                                        s
                                                                      s
                       only the latter is an allowed concerted process. The temperature at which 23 decom-
                       poses is fairly typical for strained azo compounds and it presumably proceeds by
                       a nonconcerted diradical mechanism. Since a C−N bond must be broken without
                       concomitant compensation by carbon-carbon bond formation, the activation energy is
                       higher than for a concerted process.
                           Although the concerted mechanism described in the preceding paragraph is
                       available only to those azo compounds with appropriate orbital arrangements, the
                       nonconcerted mechanism occurs at low enough temperatures to be synthetically useful.
                       The elimination can also be carried out photochemically. These reactions presumably
                       occur by stepwise elimination of nitrogen, and the ease of decomposition depends on
                                              .
                       the stability of the radical R .

                                      slow                   fast
                           R′  N  N  R      R′  N  N·  +  ·R       R′·  N  N ·R      R′ R

                       The stereochemistry of the nonconcerted reaction has been a topic of considerable
                       study. Frequently, there is partial stereorandomization, indicating a short-lived diradical
                       intermediate. The details vary from case to case, and both preferential inversion and
                       retention of relative stereochemistry have been observed.

                          CH 3                                               CH
                                   CH 3       CH 3       CH 3    CH            3      H
                                                       +           3
                            H  N  N  H                                         H  N  N  CH
                                                    CH 3                                 3
                                                       66:33 from cis
                                                       25:72 from trans
                                                      predominant inversion
                                                                                       Ref. 313

                       312   N. Rieber, J. Alberts, J. A. Lipsky, and D. M. Lemal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 5668 (1969).
                       313
                          R. J. Crawford and A. Mishra, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 3963 (1966).
   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625