Page 705 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 705

Secondary bromides and tosylates react with inversion of stereochemistry, as in    681
              the classical S 2 substitution reaction. 24  Alkyl iodides, however, lead to racemized
                          N
              product. Aryl and alkenyl halides are reactive, even though the direct displacement  SECTION 8.1
              mechanism is not feasible. For these halides, the overall mechanism probably consists  Organocopper
                                                                                             Intermediates
              of two steps: an oxidative addition to the metal, after which the oxidation state of the
              copper is +3, followed by combination of two of the groups from the copper. This
              process, which is very common for transition metal intermediates, is called reductive
              elimination. The  R Cu
 −  species is linear and the oxidative addition takes place

                               2
              perpendicular to this moiety, generating a T-shaped structure. The reductive elimi-

              nation occurs between adjacent R and R groups, accounting for the absence of R −R

              coupling product.
                                                 R
                                                                        I
                       R  X    +   R′  Cu I  R′  R′  Cu III  R′  R  R ′ + R′Cu X
                                                  X

                  Allylic halides usually give both S 2 and S 2 products, although the mixed

                                               N       N

              organocopper reagent RCu-BF is reported to give mainly the S 2 product. 25  Other
                                       3                           N
              leaving groups can also be used, including acetate and phosphate esters. Allylic acetates
                                                               26

              undergo displacement with an allylic shift (S 2 mechanism). The allylic substitution
                                                  N
              process may involve initial coordination with the double bond. 27
                                                                R  Cu  R
                                                 –
                                            R  Cu  R
                                                                   CH CH   CH
                       –
                   [R Cu]   +   CH 2  CHCH 2 X                        2      2
                    2
                                            CH 2  CH
                                                     CH 2  X
                                                                  CH  CH  + RCu
                                                              RCH 2      2
                  For substituted allylic systems, both  - and  -substitution can occur. Reaction
              conditions can influence the  - versus  -selectivity. For example, the reaction of
              geranyl acetate with several butylcopper reagents was explored. Essentially complete
               -or  -selectivity could be achieved by modification of conditions. 28  In ether both
              CuCN and CuI led to preferential  -substitution, whereas  -substitution was favored
              for all anions in THF.
                                      H ) Cu(X) Mg Br
                                   n-C 4 9 2     2
                           O CCH 3
                            2
                                                                         α − substitution
                X    solvent  Ratio α:γ   solvent  Ratio  α:γ
                                                                         γ − substitution
                CN   ether    <1:99    THF     >99:1
                Cl   ether    >99:1    THF     >99:1
                Br   ether    >99:1    THF     >99:1
                I    ether    6 :96    THF     96:4
              24   C. R. Johnson and G. A. Dutra, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 7783 (1973); B. H. Lipshutz and R. S. Wilhelm,
                 J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104, 4696 (1982); E. Hebert, Tetrahedron Lett., 23, 415 (1982).
              25
                 K. Maruyama and Y. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99, 8068 (1977).
              26
                 R. J. Anderson, C. A. Henrick, and J. B. Siddall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 735 (1970); E. E. van Tamelen
                 and J. P. McCormick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 737 (1970).
              27   H. L. Goering and S. S. Kantner, J. Org. Chem., 49, 422 (1984).
              28
                 E. S. M. Persson and J. E. Backvall, Acta Chem. Scand., 49, 899 (1995).
   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710