Page 399 - Advances in Biomechanics and Tissue Regeneration
P. 399

396                   20. BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TISSUE SURROUNDING DENTAL IMPLANTS

                        TABLE 20.2 Specification of the Number of Load Cycles for Each Load Case Tested
                                                        Number of load cycles
                        Load cases           F h              F v              F o              Total
                        LC1                  540              540              1620             2700
                        LC2                  540              1620             540              2700
                        LC3                  1620             540              540              2700
                        LC4                  900              900              900              2700




                                           20.3 ALGORITHM DESCRIPTION

           20.3.1 Numerical Discretization
              The algorithm starts with a discretization of the geometric domain under analysis. Although nodal distribution is
           directly obtained from medical images, nodal connectivity has to be imposed according to the used numerical tech-
           nique. In FEM, nodes are connected using elements. Therefore, for the same nodal distribution, different nodal con-
           nectivities can be obtained, depending on the type of the used element. For this work an irregular triangular mesh
           was used. However, NNRPIM uses a distinct approach since it is a meshless method. From the nodal distribution a
           Voronoï diagram is constructed, dividing the spatial domain into several Voronoï cells. As presented in Fig. 20.4A,
           each node possesses its respective Voronoï cell. Then, nodal connectivity is imposed using either first-order or
           second-order influence cells. For this work, second-order influence cells are used, which means that a certain node,
           n i , is connected with its first and second neighbor cells, as depicted in Fig. 20.4B. This meshless approach is more
           organic since nodal connectivity can change during the simulation, while FEM’sapproachpreestablishesaconstant
           connectivity.
              Afterward, since the problem will not be analyzed at the nodes but at the integration points the next step is to define
           their spatial localization. Following the quadrature scheme of Gauss-Legendre [19], FEM sets one integration point
           inside each element. NNRPIM first divides each Voronoï cell into several quadrilateral subcells and then imposes
           one integration point inside each cell using the Gauss-Legendre quadrature scheme. This process is schematically
           represented in Fig. 20.4C.
              Lastly a set of shape functions has also to be defined. Since triangular elements are used, FEM’s shape functions are
           isoparametric interpolation functions. The shape function of NNRPIM is constructed using the radial point interpo-
           lation technique, which combines a polynomial basis with a radial basis function. Additional information regarding
           shape functions can be found in the literature [19, 20].





















           FIG. 20.4  NNRPIM’s formulation: (A) Voronoï diagram; (B) second-order influence cells; (C) Voronoï cell division into quadrilateral integration
           subcells.







                                          II. MECHANOBIOLOGY AND TISSUE REGENERATION
   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404