Page 405 - Advances in Biomechanics and Tissue Regeneration
P. 405

402                   20. BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TISSUE SURROUNDING DENTAL IMPLANTS














































           FIG. 20.12  Intersection of FEM and NNRPIM solutions using model 2.
              The model considers only the influence of a mechanical stimulus. Thus, in the future, it would be interesting to use
           an algorithm that would simultaneously combine bone cell dynamics with distinct loading scenarios.


           Acknowledgments
                                                                                           ¸
           The authors truly acknowledge the funding provided by Minist  erio da Ci^ encia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Fundacão para a Ci^ encia e a Tecnologia
           (Portugal), under grants SFRH/BD/133105/2017 and by project funding MIT-EXPL/ISF/0084/2017. Additionally the authors gratefully acknowl-
           edge the funding of Project NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000022, SciTech, Science and Technology for Competitive and Sustainable Industries, cofi-
           nanced by Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (NORTE2020), through Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER).

           References

            [1] E. Emami, R.F. de Souza, M. Kabawat, J.S. Feine, The impact of edentulism on oral and general health, Int. J. Dent. 2013 (2013) 1–7, https://doi.
               org/10.1155/2013/498305.
            [2] T. Vos, A.D. Flaxman, M. Naghavi, R. Lozano, et al., Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010:
               a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010, Lancet 380 (9859) (2012) 2163–2196, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)
               61729-2.
            [3] L. Rissin, J.E. House, C. Conway, E.R. Loftus, H.H. Chauncey, Effect of age and removable partial dentures on gingivitis and periodontal
               disease, J. Prosthet. Dent. 42 (2) (1979) 217–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90178-1.
            [4] M. Saito, K. Notani, Y. Miura, T. Kawasaki, Complications and failures in removable partial dentures: a clinical evaluation, J. Oral Rehabil. 29 (7)
               (2002) 627–633, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00898.x.
            [5] J. Zupnik, S. Kim, D. Ravens, N. Karimbux, K. Guze, Factors associated with dental implant survival: a 4-year retrospective analysis,
               J. Periodontol. 82 (10) (2011) 1390–1395, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.100685.
            [6] S. Jivraj, W. Chee, Rationale for dental implants, Br. Dent. J. 200 (12) (2006) 661–665, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813718.
            [7] S. Raikar, P. Talukdar, S. Kumari, S.K. Panda, V.M. Oommen, A. Prasad, Factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants: a retrospective
               study, J. Int. Soc. Prev. Commun. Dent. 7 (6) (2017) 351–355, https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_380_17.



                                          II. MECHANOBIOLOGY AND TISSUE REGENERATION
   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410