Page 434 - Air Pollution Control Engineering
P. 434

10_chap_wang.qxd  05/05/2004  5:10 pm  Page 406
                    406                                                    Lawrence K.Wang et al.

                    also are used when the expected volume of VOC recovery is fairly low, because these
                    systems cannot be desorbed at the site and must be either land filled or shipped back to
                    the vendor’s desorption facility. As a result, canister systems do not receive any recov-
                    ery credits. Another characteristic of the carbon canister system is that the effluent from
                    the canister is usually not monitored continuously (via an FID, for example). Therefore,
                    operators of canister systems do not have a clear indication of when a breakthrough
                    occurs or when the system stops removing the VOC from the airstream.
                       Becuase carbon canister systems are not desorbed on site and are fairly self-contained
                    units equipped with vessels, piping, flanges, and so forth, the fundamental variable to
                    be determined in designing a canister system is the carbon requirement. Examining Eq.
                    (3) with ND (number of beds desorbing) being zero, the total amount of carbon required
                    is dependent on VOC inlet loading (M   ), total adsorption time (θ ), and working
                                                       HAP                        ad
                    capacity of the carbon (W ). Therefore, Eq. (3) becomes
                                           c
                                                  C   = M    θ / W                            (11)
                                                    req  HAP  ad  c
                       From Eq. (11), the total amount of carbon (C ) required for a canister can be deter-
                                                              req
                    mined. The first step is to determine the HAP density (D  ) using Eq. (9). The second
                                                                      HAP
                    step is to calculate HAP inlet loading, M  , using Eq. (4) and the D  . These steps
                                                         HAP                      HAP
                    are shown as follows:
                    Step 1

                                           D    = PM/RT                                        (9)
                                             HAP
                    Step 2
                                                         −5
                                           M    = 6.0 × 10 (HAP )(Q )(D  )                     (4)
                                             HAP               e   e  HAP
                       The value of M    is substituted into Eq (11) and the total amount carbon is then
                                     HAP
                    calculated. It is assumed in this handbook that this amount of carbon will yield a
                    removal efficiency of 90%. The required canister number (RCN) is determined by
                    dividing the total amount of carbon required by the amount of carbon contained in each
                    canister (typically 150 lb). To ensure sufficient carbon, the quotient is rounded up to
                    the next whole canister. Once the number of canisters is determined, the design of the
                    canister system is considered complete in this handbook and costing of the system can
                    be performed.
                    4.5. Calculation of Pressure Drops
                       Figure 3 shows the relationship between the pressure drop and carbon bed depth at var-
                    ious air velocities. The relationship holds true for any type of carbon adsorption system.

                    4.6. Summary of Application
                       At a remediation site, a granular activated carbon (GAC) system is a likely candidate
                    to be used in a control system because it is a point source having a low concentration
                    of VOCs emitting into the atmosphere. This system is characterized by its relatively low
                    capital cost, ease of installation, and ability to control a variety of VOCs. Usually, the
                    outlet VOC concentrations are required to be less than 10–50 ppmv. Additionally, GAC
                    system can be either regenerable or disposable types. Another benefit of this system is
   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439