Page 346 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 346

9.8 Structural idealization  327

          The torsional rigidity of the complete section is then

                         GJ=5000x 107+6x 1O7=5O06x 107Nmm2
          In all unrestrained torsion problems the torque is related to the rate of twist by the
          expression
                                                 d8
                                         T=GJ-
                                                 dz
          The angle of twist per unit length is therefore given by

                            de  -  T   -  10 x  lo6   = 0.0002 rad/mm
                            dz -    - 5006 x  lo7
          Substituting for T in Eq. (9.49) from Eq. (9.52), we obtain the shear flow in the closed
          section. Thus




          from which
                                       qcl = 250N/mm
          The maximum shear stress in the closed section is then 250/1.5  = 166.7N/mm2.
            In the open portion  of the section the maximum shear stress is obtained directly
          from Eq. (9.58) and is

                            T,,,,,~   = 25 000 x 2 x 0.0002 = 10 N/mm2
          It can be seen from the above that in terms of strength and stiffness the closed portion
          of the wing section dominates. This dominance may be used to determine the warping
          distribution. Having first found the position  of the centre of twist (the shear centre)
          the warping of the closed portion is calculated using the method described in Section
          9.5. The warping in the walls 13 and 34 is then determined using Eq. (9.67), in which
          the origin for the swept area AR is taken at the point 1 and the value of warping is that
          previously calculated for the closed portion at 1.





          So far in this chapter we have been concerned with relatively uncomplicated  struc-
          tural sections which in practice would be formed from thin plate or by the extrusion
          process. While these sections exist as structural members in their own right they are
          frequently used, as we saw in Chapter 7, to stiffen more complex structural shapes
          such as fuselages, wings and tail surfaces. Thus a two spar wing section could take
          the form shown in Fig. 9.45 in which Z-section stringers are used to stiffen the thin
          skin while angle sections form the spar flanges. Clearly the analysis of a section of
          this  type  would  be  complicated  and tedious  unless  some  simplifying assumptions
          were made. Generally, the number and nature of these simplifying assumptions deter-
          mine the accuracy and the degree of complexity of the analysis; the more complex the
          analysis the greater the accuracy obtained. The degree of simplification introduced is
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351