Page 61 - Analog and Digital Filter Design
P. 61

a



                 58      Analog and Digital Filter Design






                  Order1  CI    L2    c3     L4     c5    L6     C7    L8     c9    L10
                        2.0000
                        1.41421  1.41421
                        1.00000  2.00000  1.00000
                        0.76537  1.84776  1.84776  0.76537
                        0.61803  1.61803  2.00000  1.61803  0.61803
                        0.51764  1.41421  1.93185  1.93185  1.41421  0.51764
                        0.44504  1.24698  1.80194  2.00000  1.80194  1.24698  0.44504
                        0.39018  1.11114  1.66294  1.96157  1.96157  1.66294  1.11114  0.39018
                        0.34730  I .00000  1.53209  1.87938  2.00000  1.87938  1.53209  1 .OOOOO  0.34730
                   IO   0.31287  0.90798  1.41421  1.78201  1.97538  1.97538  1.78201  1.41421  0.90798  0.31287
                         L1’    C2’   L3’    C4’   L5’    C6’    L7‘   C8’    L9’   CIO’

                 Table 2.9
                 Normalized Butterworth Element Values,  Rs = RI = 1



                       The most common filter designs have equal source and  load impedance. For
                       these, the component values given in Table 2.9 should be  used. Less common
                       but still popular  are filter designs where the source and load are different by a
                       factor of  10 or more (when the load is 10 times or one-tenth of the source imped-
                       ance). For these filter designs, Table 2.8 should be used. There are obviously an
                       infinite number of  less common loads that could be  applied. Under these cir-
                       cumstances the reader should make use of  the equations given in the Appendix
                       to calculate the element values needed.


                 Chebyshev Response


                       The Chebyshev response has ripples in the passband but a smooth increase in
                       stopband attenuation. By  allowing the passband  response to have  ripples, the
                       stopband  attenuation  rises  sharply just  beyond  the cutoff  frequency. Further
                       beyond the cutoff frequency, the attenuation rises by n x 6dB/octave, which is
                       the same as the Butterworth. However, for a filter of  equal order measured at
                       the same frequency, a Chebyshev response will produce more stopband attenu-
                       ation. This is because of  the sudden rise in attenuation immediately beyond the
                       cutoff point.

                       The Chebyshev response has a disadvantage in the time domain; its group delay
                       has a greater peak level near the passband edge than the Butterworth response.
                       Also, there are ripples in the group delay that make equalization with all-pass
                       filters more difficult than in the Butterworth case.
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66