Page 172 - Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design

Full body 3-D scanners 167

Daanen, H.A., Brunsman, M.A., Robinette, K.M., 1997b. Reducing movement artifacts in
whole body scanning. In: 3dim. IEEE, p. 262.
Deng, M., Wang, Y., Li, P., 2018. Effect of air gaps characteristics on thermal protective per-
formance of firefighters’ clothing: a review. Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 30 (2), 246–267.
Devarajan, P., Istook, C.L., 2004. Validation of female figure identification technique (FFIT)
for apparel software. J. Text. Apparel Technol. Manag. 4 (1), 1–23.
Haber, H., 2006. WWDexectech: Better Dress Forms through Scan Data. Vol. 191(72).
Women’s Wear Daily, New York, p. 9.
Hotzman, J., Gordon, C.C., Bradtmiller, B., Corner, B.D., Mucher, M., Kristensen, S.,
Blackwell, C.L., 2011. Measurer’s Handbook: US Army and Marine Corps Anthropomet-
ric Surveys, 2010–2011. No. NATICK/TR-11/017), ARMY NATICK SOLDIER
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER MA.
Huang, H.Q., Mok, P.Y., Kwok, Y.L., Au, J.S., 2011. Determination of 3D necklines from
scanned human bodies. Text. Res. J. 81 (7), 746–756.
Hye, J., 1999. Body Scanning has Immediate Applications. Vol. 178(39). Women’s Wear Daily,
New York, p. 15.
ISO International Standard, 2010. 3-D Scanning Methodologies for Internationally Compatible
Anthropometric Databases, second ed. Reference number ISO 20685:2010(E).
Joseph-Armstrong, H., Hagen, K., Maruzzi, V.J., 2010. Patternmaking for Fashion Design.
Pearson Education/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Kim, D.E., LaBat, K., Bye, E., Sohn, M., Ryan, K., 2015. A study of scan garment accuracy and
reliability. J. Text. Inst. 106 (8), 853–861.
Kouchi, M., Mochimaru, M., 2011. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of
traditional and 3D anthropometry. Appl. Ergon. 42 (3), 518–527.
Lansard, M., 2018. The Best 3D Scanners. ANAWII. https://www.aniwaa.com/best-3d-body-
scanners/ (Accessed 1 February 2019).
Lerch, T., MacGillivray, M., Domina, T., 2007. 3D laser scanning: a model of multidisciplinary
research. J. Text. Apparel Technol. Manag. 5 (4), 1–8.
Mckinnon, L., Istook, C., 2001. Comparative analysis of the image twin system and the 3T6
body scanner. J. Text. Apparel Technol. Manag. 1 (2), 1–7.
Mckinnon, L., Istook, C.L., 2002. Body scanning: the effects of subject respiration and foot
positioning on the data integrity of scanned measurements. J. Fash. Market. Manag.
6 (2), 103–121.
Paquette, S., Brantley, J.D., Corner, B.D., Li, P., Oliver, T., 2000, July. Automated extraction of
anthropometric data from 3D images. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonom-
ics Society Annual Meeting. Vol. 44(38). SAGE Publications, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA,
pp. 727–730.
Park, J., Langseth-Schmidt, K., 2016. Anthropometric fit evaluation of firefighters’ uniform
pants: a sex comparison. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 56, 1–8.
Pei, J., Fan, J., Ashdown, S.P., 2019. Detection and comparison of breast shape variation among
different 3D body scan conditions: nude, with a structured bra, and with a soft bra. Text.
Res. J. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517519839398.
Robinette, K.M., Whitestone, J.J., 1992. Methods for Characterizing the Human Head for the
Design of Helmets. No. AL-TR-1992-0061)ARMSTRONG LAB WRIGHT-
PATTERSON AFB OH.
Robinette, K.M., Whitestone, J.J., 1994. The need for improved anthropometric methods for the
development of helmet systems. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 65 (5 Suppl), A95–A99
(0095–6562).