Page 176 - Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design
P. 176

Functional measurements and mobility restriction (from 3D to 4D scanning)  171



























           Fig. 7.2 Change in the chest girth with a slight lifting movement of the arms.



           standing and a bent over forward body position. This means an ease of 21.5% is caused
           by the different body position. The small measurement “hip depth” is extended by
           7.1cm, which is an increase of 39.7%.
              Furthermore, movement-related differences in measurements have a significant
           effect on the size allocation for the renting, shipping, and online retailing of work
           clothing and protective clothing. This is because the chest girth, which, as the primary
           measurement, determines the assignment of clothing sizes, changes considerably as
           shown in Fig. 7.2. The chest girth of a test subject varies between the German sizes
           56 (chest girth: 112cm) and 60 (chest girth: 120cm) only on the basis of an easily
           simulated light lifting motion. This is because every clothing size covers a scope
           of 4cm (e.g., size 56 covers the chest girth of 110–114cm). The range, therefore,
           includes three clothing sizes or a difference in the chest girth of about 8cm.
              Obviously dimensional changes like these affect the fit and the ergonomic wearing
           comfort of the clothing. However, it is not yet known what the average degree of
           extremity of movement-related changes is nor to what extent the fit and comfort
           are affected by it. This blank space should be filled by the “functional measurements”
           study (Morlock, 2015a, b). The aim of the project was the foundational research of
           movement-related body changes and the deduction of the respective dimensional dif-
           ferences (functional measurements). For the efficient application of functional mea-
           surements in clothing, the results were implemented into both ergonomic- and
           movement-oriented size system. The connection to traditional clothing sizes and
           known size designations ensures the acceptance and application of the new size sys-
           tem in practice. The focus was on the ergonomic design of work clothing and protec-
           tive clothing and thus the analysis of typical postures and movements.
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181