Page 18 - Applied Statistics And Probability For Engineers
P. 18

c01.qxd  5/9/02  1:28 PM  Page 4 RK UL 6 RK UL 6:Desktop Folder:TEMP WORK:MONTGOMERY:REVISES UPLO D CH112 FIN L:






               4     CHAPTER 1 THE ROLE OF STATISTICS IN ENGINEERING


                                 intended application, so he decides to consider an alternative design with a greater wall
                                 thickness, 1 8 inch. Eight prototypes of this design are built, and the observed pull-off force
                                 measurements are 12.9, 13.7, 12.8, 13.9, 14.2, 13.2, 13.5, and 13.1. The average is 13.4.
                                 Results for both samples are plotted as dot diagrams in Fig. 1-3, page 3. This display gives
                                 the impression that increasing the wall thickness has led to an increase in pull-off force.
                                 However, there are some obvious questions to ask. For instance, how do we know that an-
                                 other sample of prototypes will not give different results? Is a sample of eight prototypes
                                 adequate to give reliable results? If we use the test results obtained so far to conclude that
                                 increasing the wall thickness increases the strength, what risks are associated with this de-
                                 cision? For example, is it possible that the apparent increase in pull-off force observed in
                                 the thicker prototypes is only due to the inherent variability in the system and that increas-
                                 ing the thickness of the part (and its cost) really has no effect on the pull-off force?
                                    Often, physical laws (such as Ohm’s law and the ideal gas law) are applied to help design
                                 products and processes. We are familiar with this reasoning from general laws to specific
                                 cases. But it is also important to reason from a specific set of measurements to more general
                                 cases to answer the previous questions. This reasoning is from a sample (such as the eight con-
                                 nectors) to a population (such as the connectors that will be sold to customers). The reasoning
                                 is referred to as statistical inference. See Fig. 1-4. Historically, measurements were obtained
                                 from a sample of people and generalized to a population, and the terminology has remained.
                                 Clearly, reasoning based on measurements from some objects to measurements on all objects
                                 can result in errors (called sampling errors). However, if the sample is selected properly, these
                                 risks can be quantified and an appropriate sample size can be determined.
                                    In some cases, the sample is actually selected from a well-defined population. The sam-
                                 ple is a subset of the population. For example, in a study of resistivity a sample of three wafers
                                 might be selected from a production lot of wafers in semiconductor manufacturing. Based on
                                 the resistivity data collected on the three wafers in the sample, we want to draw a conclusion
                                 about the resistivity of all of the wafers in the lot.
                                    In other cases, the population is conceptual (such as with the connectors), but it might be
                                 thought of as future replicates of the objects in the sample. In this situation, the eight proto-
                                 type connectors must be representative, in some sense, of the ones that will be manufactured
                                 in the future. Clearly, this analysis requires some notion of stability as an additional assump-
                                 tion. For example, it might be assumed that the sources of variability in the manufacture of the
                                 prototypes (such as temperature, pressure, and curing time) are the same as those for the con-
                                 nectors that will be manufactured in the future and ultimately sold to customers.




                                                                                                     Time


                                                                   Population
                         Physical        Population
                          laws                                        ?                           Future
                                                                                                 population
                                                                                                    ?
                                                Statistical inference
                                 Types of                           Sample          Sample
                                 reasoning
                         Product          Sample                   x , x ,…, x      x , x ,…, x
                                                                                    1
                                                                          n
                                                                                           n
                                                                                       2
                                                                    1
                                                                      2
                         designs
                                                                  Enumerative        Analytic
                                                                     study            study
                      Figure 1-4 Statistical inference is one type of  Figure 1-5 Enumerative versus analytic study.
                      reasoning.
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23