Page 326 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 326

Tyre characteristics and vehicle handling and stability  C HAPTER 11.1

           force is defined to be positive in the upward direction  F x ¼ C Fk k
           and thus equal to the normal load of the tyre. Also U  F y ¼ C Fa a þ C Fg g                (11.1.5)
           (not provided with a y subscript) is defined positive  M z ¼ C Ma a þ C Mg g
           with respect to the negative y axis. Note, that the
           axes system is in accordance with SAE standards (SAE  These equations have been arranged in such a way that
           J670e 1976). The sign of the slip angle, however, is  all the coefficients (the force and moment slip and
           chosen opposite with respect to the SAE definition.  camber stiffnesses) become positive quantities.
             In Fig. 11.1-2 typical pure lateral (k ¼ 0) and longi-  It is of interest to note that the order of magnitude of
           tudinal (a ¼ 0) slip characteristics have been depicted  the tyre cornering stiffness ranges from about 6 to about
           together with a number of combined slip curves. The  30 times the vertical wheel load when the cornering
           camber angle g was kept equal to zero. We define pure  stiffness is expressed as force per radian. The lower value
           slip to be the situation when either longitudinal or lateral  holds for the older bias-ply tyre construction and the
           slip occurs in isolation. The figure indicates that a drop in  larger value for modern racing tyres. The longitudinal slip
           force arises when the other slip component is added. The  stiffness has been typically found to be about 50% larger
           resulting situation is designated as combined slip. The  than the cornering stiffness. The pneumatic trail is ap-
           decrease in force can be simply explained by realising  proximately equal to a quarter of the contact patch length.
           that the total horizontal frictional force F cannot exceed  The dry friction coefficient usually equals ca. 0.9, on very
           the maximum value (radius of ‘friction circle’) which is  sharp surfaces and on clean glass ca. 1.6; racing tyres may
           dictated by the current friction coefficient and normal  reach 1.5 to 2.
           load. The diagrams include the situation when the brake  For the side force which is the more important quan-
           slip ratio has finally attained the value 100% (k ¼  1)  tity in connection with automobile handling properties,
           which corresponds to wheel lock.                   a number of interesting diagrams have been presented in
             The slopes of the pure slip curves at vanishing slip are  Fig. 11.1-3. These characteristics are typical for truck and
           defined as the longitudinal and lateral slip stiffnesses  car tyres and are based on experiments conducted at the
           respectively. The longitudinal slip stiffness is designated  University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
           as C Fk . The lateral slip or cornering stiffness of the tyre,  (UMTRI, formerly HSRI). The car tyre cornering stiff-
           denoted with C Fa , is one of the most important property  ness data stem from newer findings. It is seen that the
           parameters of the tyre and is crucial for the vehicle’s  cornering stiffness changes in a less than proportional
           handling and stability performance. The slope of minus  fashion with the normal wheel load. The maximum
           the aligning torque vs slip angle curve (Fig. 11.1-1)at  normalised side force F y,peak /F z appears to decrease with
           zero slip angle is termed as the aligning stiffness and is  increasing wheel load. Marked differences in level and
           denoted with C Ma . The ratio of minus the aligning  slope occur for the car and truck tyre curves also when
           torque and the side force is the pneumatic trail t. This  normalised with respect to the rated or nominal load. The
           length is the distance behind the contact centre (pro-  cornering force vs slip angle characteristic shown at dif-
           jection of wheel centre onto the ground in wheel plane  ferent speeds and road conditions indicate that the slope
           direction) to the point where the resulting lateral force  at zero slip angle is not or hardly affected by the level of
           acts. The linearised force and moment characteristics  speed and by the condition wet or dry. The peak force
           (valid at small levels of slip) can be represented by the  level shows only little variation if the road is dry. On a wet
           following expressions in which the effect of camber has  road a more pronounced peak occurs and the peak level
           been included:                                     drops significantly with increasing speed.




















           Fig. 11.1-2 Combined side force and brake force characteristics.


                                                                                                      327
   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331