Page 50 - Automotive Engineering
P. 50

Measurement of torque, power, speed and fuel consumption        CHAPTER 2.1

                                                                These differ in three important respects from those
                                                              of, say, a steel shaft in torsion:
                                                              1. The coupling does not obey Hooke’s law: the stiff-
                                                                ness or coupling rate C c ¼ DT/Dq increases with
                                                                torque. This is partly an inherent property of the
                                                                rubber and partly a consequence of the way it is
                                                                constrained.
                                                              2. The shape of the torque–deflection curve is not in-
                                                                dependent of frequency. Dynamic torsional charac-
           Fig. 2.1a-8 Rubber bush type torsionally resilient coupling.  teristics are usually given for a cyclic frequency of
                                                                10 Hz. If the load is applied slowly the stiffness is
                                                                found to be substantially less. The following values of
           capacities of the various elements: the shaft, the cou-  the ratio dynamic stiffness (at 10 Hz) to static stiff-
           plings, the dynamometer and the engine itself.       ness of natural rubber of varying hardness are taken
             The couplings are the only element of the system, the  from Ref. 4.
           damping capacity of which may readily be changed, and
           in many cases, for example with engines of automotive
           size, the damping capacity of the remainder of the   Shore ðIHRDÞ hardness 40  50   60  70
           system may be neglected, at least in an elementary   Dynamic stiffness
           treatment of the problem, such as will be given here.  Static stiffness   1:5  1:8  2:1  2:4
             The dynamic magnifier M (Fig. 2.1a-3) has already
           been mentioned as a measure of the susceptibility of the  Since the value of C c varies with the deflection,
           engine–dynamometer system to torsional oscillation.  manufacturers usually quote a single figure which
           Now referring to Fig. 2.1a-1, let us assume that there are  corresponds to the slope of the tangent ab to the torque–
           two identical flexible couplings, of stiffness C c , one at  deflection curve at the rated torque, typically one third of
           each end of the shaft, and that these are the only sources  the maximum permitted torque.
           of damping. Fig. 2.1a-8 shows a typical torsionally re-  3. If a cyclic torque  DT, such as that corresponding to
           silient coupling in which torque is transmitted by way of  a torsional vibration, is superimposed on a steady
           a number of shaped rubber blocks or bushes which pro-  torque T, Fig. 2.1a-9, the deflection follows a path
           vide torsional flexibility, damping and a capacity to take  similar to that shown dotted. It is this feature, the
           up misalignment. The torsional characteristics of such  hysteresis loop, which results in the dissipation of
           a coupling are shown in Fig. 2.1a-9.                 energy, by an amount DW proportional to the area of
                                                                the loop that is responsible for the damping charac-
                                                                teristics of the coupling.
                                                              Damping energy dissipated in this way appears as heat in
                                                              the rubber and can, under adverse circumstances, lead to
                       Steel shaft                            overheating and rapid destruction of the elements. The
                                                              appearance of rubber dust inside coupling guards is
                                                         b    a warning sign.
                                 –Δθ    +Δθ
                                                                The damping capacity of a component such as a rubber
                                                              coupling is described by the damping energy ratio:
            Torque T (N m)                       +ΔT            j ¼  DW
                                                                     W

                                                                This may be regarded as the ratio of the energy dis-
                                                 –ΔT          sipated by hysteresis in a single cycle to the elastic energy
                                                              corresponding to the wind-up of the coupling at mean
                                                        T     deflection:

                        a
                                                                     1      1
                                                                               2
                                                                W ¼ Tq ¼ T =C c
                            Angular deflection ( )                   2      2
           Fig. 2.1a-9 Dynamic torsional characteristic of multiple bush type  The damping energy ratio is a property of the
           coupling.                                          rubber. Some typical values are given in Table 2.1a-2.


                                                                                                       43
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55