Page 147 - Basic Gas Chromatography

133 Chroma- specify condi- over or (2) of sets B
x Reproduced informa- results two Chemist 10.2 10.6 9.8 10.1 9.3 10.0 0.48 4.8%
M., to test deviation, discussed—usually
From Miller, J. 1987, p. rigorous a different carries standard defined characterize have 8.2 of Results by Obtained
fe) Poor Poor 99. (USP) laboratories more as: the contains GC a

definitions of accuracy and precision. John Wiley & Inc. United the ruggedness. is used is method relative standard itself. deviation sometimes is it = RSD usually two the of standard Precision the Chemist 10.0 12.0 9.0 11.0 8.0 10.0

(3 Inc., New York, Pharmacopeia expresses It many RSD, deviation, relative The is called = = xX to given we variables Table deviation. Analysts; Two Results

Good
(b) Poor Sons, States in oye of A 1.58 15.8%

Analysis (a) Good : Good of the Illustrations Concepts and Contrasts, Sons, & Wiley John by used term reproducibility test same the time. of period a data, of standard the as variation of information minimum each of one is relative the and of Comparison Ketone Methylethyl

Quantitative Accuracy: Precision: Fig. 8.6. tography: of courtesy related A instrument when tion extended an aset In than tion coefficient The analysis an mean the 8.2 TABLE of Analysis X Ave, o Dev., St. oye RSD,

Quantitative Analysis guidelines the of Chemical American can Chemistry con- be quality data evalu- analysis error is Then, com- the indeterminate. or statistics); (Gaussian found be should or Gaussian normal Gauss- of shape characterized be variation about mean, the are ‘‘correct”’ the as “correct” but value determine to as measured the (a) standard

and example the of and handling errors. typical determinate statistically error the follow The enough. 3.4). can It symmetrical tendency usually taken no is analyst an of accuracy. usually is the of square to analyst a at shots precision; and 8.6c poor shots of error is two in lab, one which different find that

Qualitative an As care. report the Analytical acquisition data methods for of as nonrandom the should large is (Fig. 3 the and central the is there ability his as mean XP [X(xX— a The an of represented as accuracy Figure number determinate distinguish to precision reproducibility, consequently usually

with analysis, Environmental of statistical discussion presented. Calculations classified be treated be of errors Chapter tendency measures of values these statistically The value. to referred the around _ measurements. ability precision. be good and a large a that use the to is other and and

done issues the brief are can can source random measurements in central of although is o- The his can shows accuracy; unless suggests alignment. common refers The labs expect

be trace on the of a by analysis and the and of of given Two One probable” value data the a of variance. to as accuracy 8.6a poor 8.6b of in are which different We repeatability.
analysis in Subcommittee addresses review followed of Quantitative measurement random not, number was variables—the tendency. median. analysis, “most probable of deviation, number the referred and Figure but accuracy Figure out terms instrument. instruments.

the common It [15]. here, methods of is is eliminated. distribution the distribution the an spread the is called 8.6. precision poor in is other repeatability, one among as
in are short of latter former if central for the most n is is o Precision Figure in gunsight is on good
132 steps that Society sulted ation. A given mon Statistics Errors The the and The curve ian two by the and X, value rather this The standard where tion small in good result situation the Two One and precision different as not