Page 218 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 218

Internet and Its Rad cal Potent al  |  1

              deliver the retaliation. The creation of redundant paths for packets to reach in-
              tended receivers, even if a part of the network is disabled, was the feature of the
              ARPANET that made it superior to circuit switching on the telephony model.
              The techniques of open network architectures and signaling were debated pub-
              licly by technologists at ARPA and the RAND Corporation (a U.S. defense con-
              tractor), in hopes that the Soviets would learn of the U.S. system and also adopt
              it. In other words, in spite of the paranoia and secrecy surrounding the Cold
              War military industrial complex, “our whole plan, the concept of packet switch-
              ing and all the details, was wide open. Not only did Rand publish it, they sent it
              to all the repository laboratories around the world” (Baran, in Brand 2001).


                moving BEyonD ThE miLiTary inDusTriaL ComPLEx
                The Internet’s growth beyond the military industrial complex was spurred
              by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), which subsidized connectivity
              for research universities and other knowledge centers while providing linkages
              for international networks. The NSFNET “backbone” that was designed to carry
              bulk Internet traffic was initiated in 1986 and added onto later by NASA and the
              Department of Energy. International networks such as NORDUNET, BITNET,
              and EARN connected European academic institutions. BITNET merged with
              other academic networks into the Corporation for Research and Educational
              Networking (CREN). Consortia arrangements developed independently of these
              organizations as new federal and state governments, municipal governments,
              and  corporate  members  developed  “peering”  relationships  to  share  growing
              traffic loads collaboratively.
                Despite repeated claims by the United States that democratic and global gover-
              nance of the Internet is just around the corner, the U.S. Department of Commerce
              (DOC) still retains formal control over the “root” of the Internet, which is the
              cluster of servers that maps domain names to unique Internet protocol addresses
              (such that typing www.prwatch.org takes you to IP address 209.197.113.33). The
              Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) manages the
              creation of top-level domain names and country code domain names and the ac-
              creditation of domain name registrars. As there can be only one authoritative
              root server, the ICANN’s proxy management of domain names for the DOC
              keeps the United States in charge of “ruling the root.” The ICANN also settles
              disputes involving the registration of trademarked names in “cyber-squatting”
              battles. Other global organizations contribute to Internet governance. The In-
              ternet  Society  is  an  nongovernmental  organization  that  promotes  technology
              development conducive to open standards, protocols, and administration of the
              Internet. It has been instrumental in providing training and education while col-
              laborating to establish servers and connectivity in countries around the world.


                ConTEmPorary soCiaL anD CuLTuraL asPECTs

                The  discovery  of  “cyberspace”  by  the  popular  press  in  the  early  1990s  oc-
              curred as an important genre of science fiction, such as the cyberpunk writing of
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223