Page 153 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 153

138                    R.P KAWFMAN AND TH. TOPPER


            laser  microscope  images  clearly  show  the  amount  of  deformation  at  the  asperity  tips.  The
            scanning electron microscope image of the fracture surface from specimen C shown in Fig. 11 c)
            is relatively featureless.  The flattened fracture surface is void of any significant surface features.
            It can be hypothesized that the compressive static mean stress normal to the maximum shear planes
            was large enough to prevent fast fracture until the fatigue crack propagated through the wall.


            FRACTURE SURFACES D  (BHN 203,  OStatlc Mean  = -60 MPa) AND E  (BHN 203,  Osstat,, Mean  = 100 MPa .)
            Figure  12 shows two fracture surfaces that were examined with a scanning electron microscope
            and a confocal scanning laser microscope, respectively.  Surface D is from a test with a 60 MPa
            compressive mean stress, whereas surface E is from a test with a  100 MPa tensile mean  stress.
            The surface features in Fig.  12 are uniform.  The fatigue failure regions cannot be distinguished
            from fast fracture regions on the fracture surfaces examined.












                     Compressive Mean Stress    Tensile Mean Stress
                     (Specimen  D)              (Specimen E)

            Fig.  12.  Fracture  surface  morphology  for  SAE  1045 steel, BHN  203,  taken  with  a  scanning
            electron microscope.


            ASPERITY  HEIGHT
            Average asperity height  in the fatigue failure region of the fracture surfaces was measured with
            the  confocal  scanning  laser  microscope.  Average  asperity  height  decreased  with  decreasing
            static mean stress for the hard SAE 1045 steel.  Similar results could not be ascertained from the
           fracture surfaces from specimens D and E since there was too much noise in the 2-D line profiles
            obtained.
              Figure  13 shows the CSLM asperity height profile of  Specimen A with a tensile mean stress
            of  547 MPa,  obtained  with a confocal scanning laser  microscope.  Figure  13 was  obtained  by
            measuring the asperity heights through the wall thickness including the thumbnail crack shown
            in Figure  11 (a).  It can be seen that the asperity peaks in both the fatigue crack region  (1) and
            fast  fracture  region  (2) are sharp.  The abrupt  vertical  lines  downwards  represent  noise  in the
            CSLM system.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158