Page 263 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 263

The Multiaxial Fatigue Strength of Specimens Containing Small Defects   241

         Figure 2 shows typical examples of non-propagating cracks observed in those materials at the
         fatigue limit. The direction of a non-propagating crack is approximately normal to the principal
         stress,  01,  regardless  of  combined  stress ratio,  7/0. Under  a  stress  slightly  higher  than  the
         fatigue limit, a crack which propagated in a direction normal to q resulted in the failure of the
         specimen. Based upon such observations, the fatigue limit problem for specimens containing
         small  surface  defects  when  subjected  to  combined  stress  loading  was  considered  to  be
         equivalent to a fatigue threshold problem for a small mode I  crack emanating from defects in
         the  biaxial  stress  field  of  the  maximum  principal  stress,  01,  normal  to  the  crack  and  the
         minimum principal stress, 02, parallel to the crack.
           Consider an mi-symmetric surface defect containing a mode I crack under the remote biaxial
         stresses, o, and a,, as shown in Fig. 3. The mode I SIF, ZC1,  at the crack tip is given by  the


















                                                          2,
                                                               50 pm


                                                               31.7"

                                                          Axial direction
            (a) 0.37% carbon steel; u  h = 100 pm, u, =   (b) FCD700 nodular cast iron; smooth
            175 MPa, 7, = 87.5 MPa [17].          specimen, c, = 7, = 160 MPa [24].

            Fig. 2.  Small non-propagating cracks emanating from a defect observed at fatigue limit
            under combined loading.

                          t                  t





                          +                  +
                  Y
                   Lx                        A                 B
               Fig. 3.  A three-dimensional defect leading to a crack subjected to biaxial stress.
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268