Page 314 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 314

298                       T FUKUDA AND H. NISITANI

            easily initiated in the ferrite grain in torsional fatigue of carbon steel which has a clear-banded
            structure.


            Fatigue test

            The S-N curves of all specimens are shown in Fig.12. Table 4 shows the fatigue limits  (7,and
             Z,   and the fatigue limit ratios of torsional fatigue to rotating bending fatigue ( T,,/  a,)  of all
            materials.  In  anisotropic  materials  which  have  a  clear-banded  structure  (S20C,  S45C), the
            ratios  are  0.55-0.57,  and  in  isotropic  materials  which  have  no  banded-structure (SC450,
            S45C-DA, S45C-H), the ratios are 0.65-0.68.  As  is mentioned above, in the torsional fatigue
            of carbon steel, which has a clear-banded structure, the large local strain concentration occurs
            in the ferrite. On the other hand, in the rotating bending fatigue of the same steel, the local
            strain concentration hardly occurs in the ferrite band. This produces a relative reduction of the
            torsional  fatigue  limit.  Namely,  the  fatigue  limit  ratio  ( T J (7,)   depends  on  whether  the
            specimen has a clear-banded structure or not, and does not follow the macroscopic criterion for
            plastic yielding (Mises’ criterion; tS/ us =OS).  The fatigue behavior of a specimen is related to
            the local microstructural details of the specimen. On the other hand, the macroscopic yielding
            is related to the average properties of the specimen. This is the reason why the criterion for
            macroscopic yielding is not applicable to fatigue loading under combined stresses in general.
            In discussing the results of fatigue tests under combined stresses (bending and torsion),  it is
            important to consider whether the material used has a banded structure or not.


             Classification of fatigue limit ratio  T,J U,

            The fatigue limit ratio Z J (7,  varies between 0.5 and 1 depending on the material as is shown in
             Table 1. The fatigue process consists of crack initiation and crack propagation. Therefore, by
            considering crack initiation, crack propagation, microstructure and type of defect, the value of
             fatigue limit ratio can be classified as is shown in Table 5.


             CONCLUSIONS
             (1) The local deformations are not uniformly distributed in both static tension and static torsion,
                and therefore most of local strains are not the same as the applied macroscopic strain.
             (2)  A clear-banded structure greatly affects the local strain in static torsion but it hardly affects
                that in static tension. That is, large shear strain concentration in torsion occurs in the ferrite
                band sandwiched between pearlite bands but the mean normal strain in tension in a ferrite
                band is nearly equal to that of a pearlite band.
             (3)  Because of  the above conclusion, the fatigue cracks of carbon steel with a clear-banded
                structure are initiated more easily in torsional fatigue than in bending fatigue. That is the
                reason why the fatigue limit ratio of the steel is close to 0.58 (Mises’ criterion).
             (4) The fatigue  limit  ratio  ( rJ(7,)  depends  on  whether  the  specimen  has  a  clear-banded
                structure or not, and does not follow the macroscopic criterion of yielding. In discussing
                the results of fatigue tests under combined stresses (bending and torsion), it is important to
                consider whether the material used has a banded structure or not.
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319