Page 381 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 381

The Environment Effect on Fatigue Crack Growth Rates in 7049 Aluminium Alloy at __.   365

           (b), represents pure or ideal fatigue crack growth, and this forms the reference line for the
           ideal inert behaviour which is the basis for the environment contributions [48].  This ideal
           behaviour  appears  only  if  the  vacuum  is  very  high or  impurities in  the  so-called  inert
           environments are very low or the material is non-reactive to a given environment. Deviation
           from the ideal line occurs if the crack pwth mechanism changes.
              In principle, K,,,  or its non-linear equivalent is essential for all fracture process involving
           creation of two new surfaces. For monotonic fracture, this parameter reduces to KIC. For time
           dependent crack growth process involving stress corrosion, sustained load  crack growth or
           creep crack growth, Kmax  is the governing parameter [50,51]. However, due to the cyclic
           nature of loading in fatigue, an additional parameter is needed, which describes the amplitude.
           This is M. Therefore the requirement of two parameters is intrinsic to fatigue. Of the two
           parameters, it has been shown that the magnitude of K-  is much larger than AK  for crack
           growth,  and  hence  is  the  more  dominant  parameter  of  the  two.  Thus,  there  are  two
           corresponding thresholds that must be exceeded for a crack to grow, Fig. 2 (a). At the low end
           of  R=Km,JKm,  and  especially when  R  is  negative, Kmsx controls fatigue crack  growth.
           Similarly at high R (as R approaches 1) AK controls the growth [52,53].





















           Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of AKth -Kmx versus R-ratio for controlled region (a) and the two
           parametric crack driving force hK*th-K*-  requirement for fatigue damage, with respective
           definition of the parameters.

             Threshold data, when represented in terms of a AK versus Kmx curve, typically show an L-
           shaped curve with two  limiting values corresponding to two  fundamental thresholds, Fig.
           2(b). At any other crack growth rates, the L-shaped curve shifts with the asymptotic limiting
           values, AK  and K*-  increasing with crack growth rate, as shown in Fig. 1 (a). Taking into
           account to the minor effect of the mechanical contributions to the crack advance than the
           environment effect, Vasudkvan  and  Sadananda [40] have graphically systematised a wide
           variety of materials by assuming two independent loading parameters as the relevant crack tip
           driving  forces:  AK  and  K-.   These  critical  threshold  parameters  should  be  satisfied
           simultaneously for a crack to grow and can be identified by plotting A&,  (cyclic) and K,,
           (static). The threshold line resulting of graphic construction can map the region where crack
           growth is only possible for each  material under  fatigue conditions. These two parameters
           depend on the alloy microstructure (an intrinsic property of the material),  slip mode  and
           environment.
   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386