Page 170 - Big Data Analytics for Intelligent Healthcare Management
P. 170

6.3 OUR APPROACH         163






                Table 6.8 Classification Accuracies in Percentage
                                   Logistic Regression                Support Vector Machine
                          Without            With             Without             With
                Subject   Standardization    Standardization  Standardization     Standardization
                04799     81                 93               93                  90
                04820     82                 89               85                  84
                04847     89                 94               95                  94
                05675     86                 96               97                  96
                05680     78                 94               89                  90
                05710     81                 88               88                  85
                Average   83                 92               91                  90





               6.3.6 SUBJECT-DEPENDENT EXPERIMENT ON PS/SP
               The PS and SP were removed and the test was conducted for each set separately. The organizations of
               the data used are illustrated below in Fig. 6.3, respectively for PS and SP datasets.
                  The regular accuracies achieved for every subject were recorded after experimenting 10-fold cross
               validation in Fig. 6.4.In Table 6.9, we have shown the dataset for different subject values to evaluate
               the performances of the feature selection schemes. In Table 6.10, we have shown the classification
               problem relating to every subject. We have shown the analysis on the data before the standardization
               and after the standardization. We have considered SVM and logistic regression. The precision was im-
               proved significantly after the standardization of the data and SVM showed better performance when
               compared to LR.




                                                  PS PS     PS
                                                  I , I , .... , I s16  Trial 1
                                                     s2
                                                  s1
                                   Class S              ¼                  ¼
                                                                        Trial 20
                                                  PS PS
                                                            PS
                                                  I , I , .... , I s16
                                                     s2
                                                  s1
                                                  PS PS
                                                  I , I , .... , I PS   Trial 1
                                                            p16
                                                     p2
                                                  p1
                                   Class P                                 ¼
                                                        ¼
                                                                        Trial 20
                                                  PS PS
                                                            PS
                                                  I , I , .... , I s16
                                                     s2
                                                  s1
               FIG. 6.3
               PS dataset used in this experiment.
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175