Page 366 - Cascade_Biocatalysis_Integrating_Stereoselective_and_Environmentally_Friendly_Reactions
P. 366

342  16 Aldolases as Catalyst for the Synthesis of Carbohydrates and Analogs

                      In these reactions, RhuA was the most versatile aldolase, accepting both lin-
                    ear and branched C-α-substituted N-Cbz-aminoaldehydes, while FucA tolerated
                    only C-α linear alkane substitutions. Aware of the importance of the reaction
                    medium, the reactions were assayed in both highly concentrated gel emul-
                                       ′
                    sions [17] and 1 : 4 N,N -dimethylformamide (DMF)/water mixtures. In this case,
                    the 1 : 4 DMF/water mixtures was the reaction medium of choice providing
                    the best conversions especially for sterically more demanding branched alkyl
                    substituents [16].
                      The stereochemical outcome of FucA catalysis was controlled by the aldolase,
                    furnishing always anti(3R,4R) configured aldol adducts (Scheme 16.2). RhuA was
                    highly stereoselective only for the (S)-N-Cbz-aminoaldehydes acceptors, rendering
                    the corresponding syn(3R,4S) adducts. For the (R)-configured substrates, different
                    syn(3R,4S): anti(3R,4R) diastereomeric aldol mixtures were obtained. Interestingly,
                    it was observed that the amount of anti(3R,4R) adduct increased with the length
                    of the C-α alkyl chain of the acceptor, being the major diastereomer when (R)-
                    N-Cbz-2-butylglycinal ((R)-1c) was the acceptor. RAMA did not tolerate any of
                    the N-Cbz-aminoaldehydes 1a–h in any of the reaction systems assayed. This
                    behavior was somehow predictable, considering the low conversion observed
                    in a previous work during RAMA-catalyzed aldolization of (S)- and (R)-N-Cbz-
                    alaninal [14b] and the fact that the basic amino acids K107 and R109, located
                    at the RAMA active site to fix its natural aldehyde acceptor d-glyceraldehyde-3-
                    phosphate, may hamper an effective interaction with hydrophobic C-α substituted
                    aldehydes.
                      The recent discovery and synthetic developments of d-fructose-6-phosphate
                    aldolase (FSA) from E. coli, which gave identical syn(3S,4R)-configured aldol
                    adducts to those obtainable with RAMA, eclipsed further investigations directed
                    toward improving the substrate tolerance of the DHAP-dependent aldolase. The
                    main reason for this decision was the fact that FSA accepts unphosphorylated
                    DHA donor and its analogs with unprecedented high activity. This was considered
                    a great advantage from the synthetic point of view, especially when the phosphate
                    group must be introduced in the substrate and removed from the final product.
                    This issue will be further discussed below.
                      As mentioned before, we found that FucA tolerated only C-α linear substi-
                    tuted (i.e., (S)-, (R)-1a–c) N-Cbz-aminoaldehydes, whereas branched substitutions
                    (i.e., (S)-, (R)-1d–g) were solely substrates for RhuA. To overcome this limita-
                    tion, a set of FucA mutants were envisaged to remove bulky amino acid side
                    chains in the active site to facilitate the accommodation of sterically demand-
                    ing acceptor aldehydes, including the conformationally restricted prolinal and
                    hydroxyprolinal derivatives. The corresponding mutants F131A, F206A, and F113A
                    and the double mutations F131A/F206A and Y113A/F131A were thus obtained.
                    In addition, Del (207–215), Del (211–215), and the combination F131A/Del
                    (207–215) were also constructed to eliminate totally or partially the FucA C-
                    terminal tail [18] which might block the acceptor binding and/or prevent its suitable
                    positioning (Figure 16.1) [19].
   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371