Page 218 - Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook Volume 1, Fundamentals
P. 218

CHAPTER 8

                          BIODYNAMICS: A LAGRANGIAN

                          APPROACH




                          Donald R. Peterson
                          University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington,
                          Connecticut
                          Ronald S. Adrezin
                          University of Hartford, West Hartford, Connecticut






                         8.1 MOTIVATION  195                  8.5 INTRODUCTION TO THE KINEMATICS
                         8.2 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DYNAMICS  197  TABLE METHOD  210
                         8.3 THE BIODYNAMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF   8.6 BRIEF DISCUSSION  218
                          THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION  198        8.7 IN CLOSING  219
                         8.4 THE LAGRANGIAN (AN ENERGY        REFERENCES  219
                          METHOD) APPROACH  198









              8.1 MOTIVATION

                          Athletic performance, work environment interaction, and medical sciences involving rehabilitation,
                          orthotics, prosthetics, and surgery rely heavily on the analysis of human performance. Analyzing
                          human motion allows for a better understanding of the anatomical and physiological processes
                          involved in performing a specific task, and is an essential tool for accurately modeling intrinsic and
                          extrinsic biodynamic behaviors (Peterson, 1999). Analytical dynamic models (equations of motion)
                          of human movement can assist the researcher in identifying key forces, movements, and movement
                          patterns to measure, providing a base or fundamental model from which an experimental approach
                          can be determined and the efficacy of initially obtained data can be evaluated. At times, the funda-
                          mental model may be all that is available if laboratory or field-based measurements prove to be costly
                          and impractical. Finally, it permits the engineer to alter various assumptions and/or constraints of the
                          problem and compare the respective solutions, ultimately gaining an overall appreciation for the
                          nature of the dynamic system.
                            As an example, consider the motion of an arm-forearm system illustrated in Fig. 8.1. The
                          corresponding equation of motion for the elbow joint (point C), or a two-link, multibody system
                          is given in Eq. (8.1).

                                                 Iθ +  mgl cos θ +  M  Applied  =  M Elbow    (8.1)



                                                                                               195
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223