Page 173 - Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair
P. 173

148            SECTION 2                                        STRENGTHENING AND REPAIR WORK




                                                 Traffic     Abutment



                                                         T-Beam
                                                  Stiff                                Ell-Beam
                                                  Diaphragm














                                           Continuous Slab on Beams          Abutment
                        Figure 4.5  Dome or arching actions at boundary of continuous deck slabs (biaxial and diagonal bending).



                            The magnitude of dome action will depend upon:
                        1. Actual boundary conditions of the slab caused by beam depth and resulting eccentricity
                            between the slab neutral axis and beam neutral axis.
                        2. In an internal panel, boundary conditions will approach to fixity depending upon the rela-

                            tive stiffness of slab to beam, with the shear connectors preventing any in-plane displace-
                            ments.
                        3. Aspect ratio (span of slab to span of supporting beam at right angles).
                            Compression results from membrane or planar stress which is currently neglected in deck

                        slab design. Membrane force would result in reduced deflections and would alter stresses in
                        shear connectors which provide composite action. Deck slabs curved in plan and composite
                        with curved beams would experience a greater effect of membrane forces in the slab and axial
                        force in the curved beam.
                            The biharmonic equation for planar stress needs to be applied simultaneously with the plate
                        bending equation to compute membrane forces.
                                             2
                                                                           2
                                                                               2
                                                  2
                                                            2
                                         N  (; w/;x ) 6 2N  (; w/;x ;y) 4 N  (; w/;y ) 3 0        (4.11)
                                                        xy
                                                                        y
                                          x

                            By using Airy stress function, the field equation for deck slab analysis becomes:
                                                                 2
                                                             2
                                                         4
                                                                       4
                                                   4
                                                                           4
                                              4
                                            (; )/;x ) 4 2(; )/; x ;y ) 4 (; )/;y ) 3 0            (4.12)
                            where ) 3 -/D
                            The arching action in a slab in a given panel gives rise to pure compression zones near
                        supports. This effect is analogous to beam-column behavior in which compressive stress is ac-
                        companied by bending stress. Compressive stress is higher than bending stress at supports, and
                        net stress is compression. It changes to tension below the neutral axis at midspan.
                            Unlike floors in buildings where two-way slab bending is predominant, bridges have unidi-

                        rectional bending except when stiff diaphragms are present.
                            The following are advantages of arching action:

                        1. Midspan deflection is lower.
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178