Page 227 - Cam Design Handbook
P. 227

THB7  8/15/03  1:58 PM  Page 215

                                GEOMETRY OF PLANAR CAM PROFILES            215

               It is apparent that having e > a would lead to more unbalance, since this would be
            equivalent to adding material to the cams, a minimum value of e being preferred in this
            case. Choosing e = a and using the maximum value of t cw, we minimize the counterweight
            size; in other words, we minimize the radius of the counterweight. With these constraints,
            the value of f can be readily computed.
               For the case of a speed reduction of 8:1, we computed the counterweight and created
            a solid model in Pro/Engineer, as displayed in Fig. 7.26, with the parameters t 2 = 5mm,
            a = e = 9.5mm, b = 23.5mm, c = 12.5mm, d 2 = 9.85mm, d 3 = 27mm, t cam = 6mm, t cw =
                                                 2
                                             6
            8mm, c cam = 9.8235mm, A cam = 1.6253 ¥ 10 mm , and f = 8.7866mm.

            REFERENCES

            Al-Daccak, M., and Angeles, J., “The Calculation of the Volumetric Properties of Sweep-Generated
              Solids Via Line Integration,” ASME, J. of Mechanical Design, 115 (1): 110–118, 1993.
            Angeles, J., Chaoming, Z., Duarte, R., and Ning, H., “The Evaluation of Moments of 3-D Solids of
              Revolution Using Spline Approximations of the Boundary,” ASME, J. of Mechanical Design, 112:
              108–110, 1990.
            Angeles,  J.,  and  Lopez-Cajún,  C.S.,  Optimization  of  Cam  Mechanisms,  Kluwer  Academic
              Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.
            Brand, L., Advanced Calculus, John Wiley, New York, 1965.
            Chan, Y.W., and Kok, S.S., “Optimum Cam Design,” Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol., 9 (1): 34–47,
              1996.
            Dierckx, P., Curve and Surface Fitting with Splines, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
            Golub, G.H., and Van Loan, C.F., Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore,
              1983.
            González-Palacios,  M.A.,  and Angeles,  J.,  “The  Design  of  a  Novel  Mechanical Transmission  for
              Speed Reduction,” ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, 121 (4): 538–551, 1999.
            Kahaner, D., Moler, C., and Nash, S., Numerical Methods and Software, Prentice Hall, Englewood
              Cliffs, N.J., 1989.
            Koloc, Z., and Václacík, M., Cam Mechanisms, Elsevier, New York, 1993.
            Lee,  M.K.,  Design  for  Manufacturability  of  Speed-Reduction  Cam  Mechanisms,  M.  Eng. Thesis,
              Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, 2001.
            Marsden, J.E., and Tromba, A.J., Vector Calculus, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1988.
            Navarro-Martínez, O.R., The Synthesis of Speed-Rectifying Mechanisms for Mechatronic Applica-
              tions, M.Eng. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, 1999.
            Rogers,  D.F.,  An  Introduction  to  NURBS:  With  Historical  Perspective,  Academic  Press,  San
              Francisco, Calif., 2001.
            Srinivasan, L.N., and Ge, Q.J., “Fine Tuning of Rational B-Spline Motions,” Proc. ASME Design
              Engineering Technical Conferences, September, Sacramento, Calif., 1997.
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232