Page 431 - Cam Design Handbook
P. 431

THB13  9/19/03  7:56 PM  Page 419

                                CAM SYSTEM DYNAMICS—RESPONSE               419

               Applying the optimality criterion discussed above requires reconciling the number of
            desired boundary conditions with the number specifiable by the use of optimal-control
            theory. To minimize the output residual vibrations, the ten boundary conditions given by
            Eq. (13.32) are sufficient. These ensure zero initial and end cam velocities and accelera-
            tions, thus maintaining continuity at the terminals.

            13.5.4.2 Relative Vibration and Relative Vibrational Energy.  With damping neglected
            and using the definition of R v , Eq. (13.30) can be rewritten as
                                      ( K - ) 1      F ˙˙
                                   ˙˙
                                   R +  k   (2pl )  2  R =  fe           (13.33)
                                    v             v
                                        K            K
                                         k            k
            where
                                        F =  K Y -  Y.                   (13.34)
                                         fe  k c
               After integrating Eq. (13.33) with respect to R v, the left-hand side becomes the rela-
            tive vibrational energy of the output. It follows that this vibrational energy is controllable
                          ¨
            by  the  parameter,  F fe.  In  the  same  way,  control  of  the  third  derivative  of  the  effective
                             ...
            follower-spring force, F fe, controls the time rate-of-change of relative vibrational energy.
            Hence,  the  continuity  of  this  time  rate-of-change  of  the  relative  vibrational  energy  is
            directly related to the continuity of the cam acceleration. The latter is specifiable through
            the boundary conditions given by Eq. (13.32).
            13.5.4.3 Problem Formulation Based on the Output Criterion.  From the discussion
            above, the problem formulation based on the output optimality criterion may be written
            as follows:
            Minimize
                                        1
                                            2 ˙˙
                                    J = ( W F +  W F d ) t               (13.35)
                                                  2 ˙˙˙
                                       Ú 0  1  fe  2  fe
            such that system Eq. (13.30) and boundary conditions Eq. (13.32) are satisfied.

            13.5.5 Development of an Optimality Criterion-2: Cam Criterion
            13.5.5.1 General.  The optimality criteria derived up to this point are for output char-
            acteristics. It is also desirable to introduce criteria for cam contact stress to allow a com-
            promise between output performance and cam contact stress.


            13.5.5.2 Contact Stress at Cam-Follower Interface.  The Hertzian contact stress at the
            cam-follower interface is a nonlinear function of parameters such as pressure angles, cam
            offset, roller-follower mass, preload, follower-guide dimensions, follower-guide friction,
            and cam curvature. These parameters can be grouped into three nonlinear factors, each
            highlighting certain aspects of the cam contact stress.
               Factor  S F allows  for  follower  guide  friction  and  follower  pressure  angle.  It  relates
            the follower-spring force f f on the output mass to the cam contact force f c and is given in
            normalized form as:
                                          F =  F S .                     (13.36)
                                                F
                                           c
                                              f
   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436