Page 456 - Cam Design Handbook
P. 456

THB13  9/19/03  7:56 PM  Page 444

          444                      CAM DESIGN HANDBOOK

             It may be mentioned that higher orders are possible than 5-6-7-8-9 to control the jerk
          of the follower motion, but they are not justified in view of the additional effort necessary
          and  fabrication  inaccuracies  that  will  exist.  Furthermore,  the  changes  in  contour  are
          negligible, being in the tens of thousandths of an inch.


          13.7.10 Ramps or Subcams
          In all polydyne cam designs, it is necessary to bring the linkage to its starting point with
          a smooth curve. This curve, as previously explained, is needed in many high-speed designs
          to compensate for the change in length due to temperature, wear, and flexibility of the
          parts. It is also sometimes needed to start the follower motion, to prevent the follower
          from leaving the cam, and to provide values of velocity and acceleration to the follower.
          We saw that the 3-4-5 polynomial required a ramp which gave the follower an initial dis-
          placement, velocity, and acceleration. We also found that the 4-5-6-7 polynomial needed
          a ramp for initial displacement and acceleration; the 5-6-7-8-9 polynomial requires only
          a displacement value from the ramp.
             The design of the ramp for polydyne cams is very important. The combination dwell-
          rise-dwell  curves  are  good  choices  to  fulfill  the  3-4-5  and  4-5-6-7  polynomial  ramp
          requirements. The 5-6-7-8-9 polynomial could be provided with a ramp of the dwell-rise-
          dwell type, i.e., cycloidal or 3-4-5 type. Some of the ramps employed (Chap. 2) are: (1)
          cycloidal; (2) cubic no. 1; (3) combination curves of parabolic motion followed by con-
          stant velocity; (4) combination curves of parabolic motion followed by constant velocity
          and finished with cubic no. 1.
             It may be mentioned that in all examples the end points had zero boundary conditions.
          If finite end point values are needed to suit the ramp or for another reason, it may be
          fulfilled by further application of the polynomial equations.


          13.7.11 DRRD Cams
          The  polydyne  method  can  also  be  used  to  design  dwell-rise-return-dwell  (D-R-R-D)
          cams. Again, displacement, velocity, and acceleration must be zero at the event terminals,
          but at the midevent point, velocity should be zero, displacement is 1, and acceleration
          is unspecified. Or, when x = 1: y = 0, y¢= 0, y≤= 0; when x = 0: y = 1, y¢= 0. Assuming
          the  cam  is  symmetric  the  first  half-event  characteristic  will  be  y(-x)  for  the  function
          above.  Additionally,  if  acceleration  is  to  be  smoothly  continuous  across  the  axis
          dividing the first and second quadrants, its rate of change must be zero. Therefore, another
          condition is that when x = 0, y  = 0. The simplest polynomial satisfying these conditions
          is
                                  y =+ C x +  C x + C x .
                                    1
                                                    5
                                               4
                                          2
                                        2    4    5
             When the coefficients are evaluated, the results are the equations and characteristics of
          Fig. 13.24. Many alternative equations could also be used. However, the equation must
                                  3
                       2
          always have an x term but no x term, to preserve the acceleration peak at x = 0. Another
          acceptable trial equation is
                                  y =+  C x +  C x +  C x .
                                          2
                                               5
                                                    6
                                    1
                                        2    5    6
          The results are shown in Fig. 13.25. Here, the maximum positive and negative accelera-
          tions are about the same, whereas in Fig. 13.24 the negative acceleration peak was sig-
          nificantly larger.
   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461