Page 255 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 255

232                        Notes

         date  for  a  second  time,  that  the  Senate  did  not  legally  pursue  the  murder
         of  Tiberius  in  the  streets—all  this  speaks  for  a  radical  decline  in  the
         legitimacy  of  the  existing  order.
           rz.  E.  Werner,  M.  Erbstésser,  Ideologische  Probleme  des  mittelalter-
         lichen  Plebejertums  (Berlin,  1960).
           12.  M.  Becker,  “Florentine  Politics  and  the  Diffusion  of  Heresy  in  the
         Trecento,”  Spectaculum  34(1959):67-75.
           13.  N.  Cohen,  The  Pursuit  of  the  Millenium  (London,  1957);  J.  B.
         Russel,  Religious  Dissent  in  the  Middle  Ages  (New  York,  1971).
           14.  K.  Jaspers,  The  Great  Philosophers,  H.  Arendt,  ed.,  (New  York,
         1962).
           15.  J.  Rawls,  A  Theory  of  Justice  (Cambridge,  Mass.,  1971).
           16.  K.-O.  Apel,  “Das  Apriori  der  Kommunikationsgemeinschaft  und
         die  Grundlagen  der  Ethik,”  in  Transformation  der  Philosophie,  vol.  2
         (Frankfurt,  1973),  pp.  358-436.
           17.  R.  Débert,  “Zur  Logik  des  Ubergangs  von  archaischen  zu  hochkul-
         turellen  Religionssystemen,”  in  K.  Eder,  ed.,  Die  Entstehung  von  Klass-
         engesellschaften  (Frankfurt,  1973),  pp.  330-363.
           18.  Rousseau,  The  Social  Contract,  Book  I,  Chapter  6.
           19.  H.  Grebing,  “Volksreprasentation  und  identitare  Demokratie,’”’  Po-
         litische  Vierteljabresschrift  (1972)  :162-180;  J.  Fijalkowski,  “Bemerkun-
         gen  zu  Sinn  und  Grenzen  der  Ratediskussion,’  in  M.  Greiffenhagen,
         Demokratisierung  in  Staat  und  Gesellschaft  (Minchen,  1973),  pp.  124-
         139;  F.  Scharpf,  “Demokratie  als  Partizipation,”  in  ibid.,  pp.  117-124;
         and  H.  von  Hentig,  Die  Wiederherstellung  der  Politik  (Stuttgart,  1973).
           20.  P.  Bachrach,  The  Theory  of  Democratic  Elitism:  A  Critique  (Bos-
         ton,  1967);  C.  Pateman,  Participation  and  Democratic  Theory  (Cam-
         bridge,  1970);  and  Q.  Skinner,  ‘““The  Empirical  Theorists  of  Democracy
         and  Their  Critics:  A  Plague  on  Both  Their  Houses,”  Polrtical  Theory
         1(1973 ) :287-306.
           21.  Von  Kielmannsegg,  “Legitimitat  als  analytische  Kategorie,”  p.  38r.
           22.  N.  Luhmann,  Legitimation  durch  Verfahren  (Neuwied,  1969).
           23.  J.  Habermas,  Legitimation  Crisis  (Boston,  1975),  Ppp.  142-143.
           24.  L.  Basso,  “Gesellschaft  und  Staat  in  der  Marxschen  Theorie,”  in
         Basso,  Gesellschaftsformation  und  Staatsform  (Frankfurt,  1975),  pp.
         10-46.
           25.  C.  Offe,  Bildungsreform  (Frankfurt,  1975),  pp.  24-25.
           26.  Cf.  my  concept  of  a  “system  crisis”  in  Legitimation  Crisis,  pp.
         24-31.
           27.  C.  Tilly,  “Reflections  on  the  History  of  European  State-Making,”
         in  Tilly,  ed.,  The  Formation  of  National  States  in  Western  Europe  (Prince-
         ton,  1975),  pp.  3-83.
           28.  I.  Wallerstein,  The  Modern  World-System  (New  York,  1974).
           29.  S.  E.  Finer,  “State-  and  Nation-Building  in  Europe:  The  Role  of
         the  Military,”  in  Tilly,  ed.,  The  Formation  of  National  States,  pp.  84-
         163.
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260