Page 251 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 251
228 Notes
29. Cf. A. Touraine, La Société post-industrielle (Paris, 1969); and D,
Bell, The Coming of Postindustrial Society (New York, 1973).
30. Godelier, Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology.
31. Marx, A Contribution, Preface, p. 21.
32. Stalin, Dialectical and Historical Materialism.
33. Godelier, Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology.
34. Marx and Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party, in L. Feuer,
ed., Marx and Engels: Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy (New
York, 1959), p. 19.
35. I. Sellnow, “Die Auflésung der Urgemeinschaftsordnung,” in K.
Eder, ed., Die Entstehung von Klassengesellschaften (Frankfurt, 1973),
Pp. 69-112.
36. S. Moscovici, The Human History of Nature (New York, 1977).
37. Marx, A Contribution, Preface, p. 21.
38. A. Gehlen, “Anthropologische Ansicht der Technik,” in Gehlen,
Technik im technischen Zeitalter (Diisseldorf, 1965); and cf. my re-
marks in Toward a Rational Society, pp. 87 ff.
39. J. Piaget, The Principles of Genetic Epistemology (New York,
1972).
40. E. C. Welskopf, “Schauplatzwechsel und Pulsation des Fortschritts,”
in E. Schulin, ed., Universalgeschichte (Koln, 1974), pp. 122-123.
41. Hoffmann, “Zwei aktuelle Probleme.”
42. V. G. Childe, What Happened in History (London, 1964), pp.
55 ff; C. M. Cipolla, “Die zwei Revolutionen,” in Universalgeschichte,
pp. 87-95.
43. Danilova, “Controversial Problems,” pp. 282-283.
44. E.R. Service, Primitive Social Organization (New York, 1962).
45. K. Eder, Die Entstehung staatlich organisierter Gesellschaften
(Frankfurt, 1976).
46. Pecirka, “Von der asiatischen Produktionsweise.”
47. R. Gunther, “Herausbildung und Systemcharakter der vorkapi-
talistischen Gesellschaftsformationen,” Zeztschrift fir Geschichtswissen-
schafi, 16 (1968) :1204-1211.
48. Gericke, “Zur Dialektik.”
49. These phenomena stimulated Karl Jaspers to construct his notion
of an “axial period”; cf. his The Origin and Goal of History (New
York, 1976).
50. F. Tokei, Zur Frage der asiatischen Produktionsweise (Neuwied,
1965).
51. M. Finley, “Between Slavery and Freedom,” Comparative Studies
in Society and History, 6(April, 1964).
52. J. Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, pp. 17 ff.; K. Eder, “Komplexi-
tat, Evolution und Geschichte,” in Theorie der Gesellschaft, Supplement
I (Frankfurt, 1973).
53. L. Kohlberg, “Stage and Sequence,” in D. Goslin ed., Handbook