Page 246 - Communication and the Evolution of Society

223 Notes

11. This is not a question of linear development; there are phases of
regression in the transition from one stage to the next. Cf., e.g., D. Elkind,
“Egocentrism in Adolescence,” in Child Development 38 (1967) :1025-
1034.
12. J. Piaget, The Child’s Conception of Time (New York, 1970), and
The Child’s Conception of Physical Causality (London, 1966).
13. R. Dobert, “Modern Religion and the Relevance of Religious Move-
ments,” unpubl. MS, Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung der Lebens-
bedingungen der wissenschaftlichtechnischen Welt, Starnberg, 1975.
14. B. Neuendorff, ‘“Geschlechtliche Identitat. Zur Strukturierung der
Person-Unwelt-Interaktion,” Diss., Free University of Berlin, 1976.
15. J. Habermas, “Notizen zum Begriff der Rollenkompetenz,” in
Kultur und Kritik, pp. 195-231.
16. E. Goffman, Stigma (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963).
17. G. H. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society From the Standpoint of a
Social Behaviorist, C. W. Morris, ed. (Chicago, 1934), and The Social
Psychology of George Herbert Mead, A. Strauss, ed. (Chicago, 1956).
18. M. Looser, “Personalpronomen und Subjektivitat,” in A. Leist,
Materialistische Sprachtheorie (Kronberg, 1975); and cf. the bibliography
provided there.
19. R. Dobert, G. Nunner-Winkler, Adoleszenzkrise und Identitdts-
bildung (Frankfurt, 1975); and H. Stierlein, Eltern und Kinder im
Prozess der Ablésung (Frankfurt, 1975).
20. Cf. the schema developed by U. Oevermann, reproduced in Kultur
und Kritik, p. 231. On the critique of conventional role theory, see L.
Krappmann, Dimensionen der Identitat (Stuttgart, 1969); H. Joas, Zur
gegenwartigen Lage der soziologischen Rollentheorie (Frankfurt, 1973);
H. Dubiel, Identitat nnd Institution (Giitersloh, 1973); and D. Geulen,
“Das vergesellschaftete Subjekt,” 2 vols., Diss., Free University of Berlin,
1975.
21. [Habermas may be referring here to “Notizen zum Begriff der
Rollenkompetenz,” pp. 222 ff.]
22. T. Luckmann, “On the Boundaries of the Social World,” in M.
Natanson, ed., Phenomenology and Social Reality (The Hague, 1970),
Pp. 73-100.
23. V. Lanternari, The Religions of the Oppressed; a Siudy of Modern
Messianic Cults (London, 1963).
24. G. Devereux, Normal und Anormal (Frankfurt, 1974).
25. Cf. J. Habermas, “Uberlegungen zum evolutionaren Stellenwert
des modernen Rechts,” in Habermas, Zvr Rekonstruktion des Historischen
Materialismus (Frankfurt, 1976), pp. 260-267.
26. J. Habermas, Strukturwandel der Offentlichkeit (Neuwied, 1962),
parts I and I].
27. Marx analyzed this double identity—with reference naturally to
Rousseau—in “On the Jewish Question,” Writings of the Young Marx