Page 245 - Communication and the Evolution of Society

222 Notes

Inner Conflict,” in J. C. Glidewell, ed., Parental Attitudes and Child Be-
havior (Springfield, 1961), pp. 5 ff.; P. Madison, Freud’s Concept of
Repression and Defense (London, 1961). The attempt (in connection
with the investigation of cognitive style) to find correlations between
problemsolving and defense strategies (coping and defense mechanisms)
is certainly interesting; cf. T. C. Kroeber, “The Coping Functions of the
Ego-Mechanisms,” in R. W. White, ed., The Study Of Lives (New York,
1963), pp. 178-200; N. Haan, “Tripartite Model of Egofunctioning,”
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (1969) :14-30.
21. G. C. Gleser and D. Ihilebich, “An Objective Instrument for Mea-
suring Defense-Mechanisms,”’ in Journal of Normal and Clinical Psy-
chology (1969) :51-6o; B. Neuendorff, Geschlecht und Identitat und die
Struktur der Person-Umwelt-Inieraktion, dissertation (Berlin, 1976).

Notes to “Historical Materialism and the Development of Normative
Structures”
1. A. Wellmer, Critical Theory of Society (New York, 1971), and
“Communication and Emancipation: Reflections on the Linguistic Turn
in Critical Theory,” in John O'Neill, ed., On Critical Theory (New York,
1976), pp. 231-263; and J. Habermas, “Uber das Subjekt der Geschichte,”
in Habermas, Kwltur und Kritik (Frankfurt, 1973), pp. 389-398.
2. I. Fetscher, Karl Marx und der Marxismus (Munich, 1967); and
O. Negt, “Marxismus als Legitimationswissenschaft,” introduction to A.
Deborin and N. Bucharin, Kontroversen uber dialektischen und mecha-
nistischen Materialismus (Frankfurt, 1969), pp. 7-50.
3. U. Oevermann, “Zur Theorie der individuellen Bildungsprozesse,”
unpubl. MS, Max-Planck-Institut fir Bildungsforschung, Berlin, 1974.
4. H. Reichelt, Zur logischen Struktur des Kapitalbegriffs bet K. Marx
(Frankfurt, 1970).
5. H. J. Sandkiibler and R. de la Vega, eds., Marxismus and Ethik
(Frankfurt, 1974).
6. K. O. Apel, “Sprechakttheorie und die Begriindung der Ethik,” in
K. O. Apel, ed., Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie (Frankfurt, 1976).
7. J. Habermas, “What is Universal Pragmatics?,” supra.
8. J. Habermas, Legitimation Crisis (Boston, 1975), pp. 8 ff.
9. J. Piaget, The Moral Judgment of the Child (New York, 1965);
and L. Kohlberg, “Stage and Sequence,” in D. Goslin, ed., Handbook of
Socialization Theory and Research (Chicago, 1969), and “From is to
Ought,” in T. Mischel, ed., Cognitive Development and Epistemology
(New York, 1971), pp. 151-236.
ro. {The first of these three “domains’—law and morality—is dealt
with in the next essay. What follows is a brief sketch of the types of
“homologies” conjectured for the other two domains, world-views and
group identities. ]